Suppr超能文献

卫生保健专业人员和受训者对物质使用障碍患者的污名化以及减少污名化的干预措施:系统评价。

Stigma Against Patients With Substance Use Disorders Among Health Care Professionals and Trainees and Stigma-Reducing Interventions: A Systematic Review.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2024 Feb 1;99(2):221-231. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005467. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In this systematic review, the authors examine the prevalence and extent of stigmatizing attitudes among health care professionals (HCPs) and trainees against patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), including research on interventions to reduce stigma.

METHOD

The authors searched 7 databases for articles published from January 1, 2011, through February 15, 2023, that quantified SUD stigma among HCPs or trainees. Inclusion criteria allowed both observational and intervention studies from the United States or Canada to be included in this review. Quality assessment was applied to all included studies; studies were not excluded based on quality.

RESULTS

A total of 1,992 unique articles were identified of which 32 articles (17 observational studies and 15 intervention studies), all conducted in the United States, met the inclusion criteria. Half of the included studies (16 of 32) were published in 2020 or later. Most of the intervention studies (13 of 15) used a single-group pre-post design; interventions involved didactics and/or interactions with persons with SUDs. The 32 included studies used a total of 19 different measures of stigma. All 17 observational studies showed some degree of HCP or trainee stigma against patients with SUDs. Most intervention studies (12 of 15) found small but statistically significant reductions in stigma after intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

SUD stigma exists among HCPs and trainees. Some interventions to reduce this stigma had positive impacts, but future studies with larger, diverse participants and comparison groups are needed. Heterogeneity among studies and stigma measures limits the ability to interpret results across studies. Future rigorous research is needed to determine validated, consensus measures of SUD stigma among HCPs and trainees, identify stigma scores that are associated with clinical outcomes, and develop effective antistigma interventions for HCPs and trainees.

摘要

目的

在这项系统评价中,作者检查了卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)和受训者对患有物质使用障碍(SUDs)的患者的污名化态度的流行程度和严重程度,包括研究减少污名化的干预措施。

方法

作者在 7 个数据库中搜索了 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 2 月 15 日期间发表的文章,这些文章量化了 HCPs 或受训者对 SUD 的污名化态度。纳入标准允许纳入来自美国或加拿大的观察性和干预性研究。对所有纳入的研究进行了质量评估;未根据质量排除研究。

结果

共确定了 1992 篇独特的文章,其中 32 篇文章(17 项观察性研究和 15 项干预性研究)全部在美国进行,符合纳入标准。纳入研究的一半(32 篇中的 16 篇)发表于 2020 年或之后。大多数干预性研究(15 项中的 13 项)采用单组前后测设计;干预措施涉及与 SUD 患者的互动和教学。32 项纳入的研究共使用了 19 种不同的污名化措施。17 项观察性研究均显示 HCP 或受训者对 SUD 患者存在一定程度的污名化。大多数干预性研究(15 项中的 12 项)发现干预后污名化程度有小但具有统计学意义的降低。

结论

HCPs 和受训者中存在 SUD 污名化。一些减少这种污名化的干预措施产生了积极的影响,但需要进行更多具有更大、更多元参与者和对照组的未来研究。研究之间的异质性和污名化措施限制了对研究结果的跨研究解释能力。未来需要进行严格的研究,以确定 HCPs 和受训者中 SUD 污名化的经过验证的共识测量方法,确定与临床结果相关的污名化评分,并为 HCPs 和受训者开发有效的抗污名化干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验