Anghel-Lorinți Anca-Elena, Faur Andrei-Bogdan, Rotar Raul N, Jivănescu Anca
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes", B-dul Revolutiei 1989, No. 9, 300580 Timisoara, Romania.
TADERP Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes", B-dul Revolutiei 1989, No 9, 300580 Timisoara, Romania.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;11(12):1204. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11121204.
Dentistry is steadily evolving along the digital pathway at a constant and sure pace. Intraoral scanners (IOSs) started to enhance the precision and trueness of the restorations, making prosthodontics treatment more predictable. The objective of this study was to compare the trueness and internal fit of the printed provisional veneers for 60 preparations with three different types of finish lines. The abutments were scanned with the same intraoral scanner, and the resulting meshes were overlapped and analyzed in metrology software. The comparison was executed using two methods: (1) CAD (computer-aided design) designs vs. scanned veneers and (2) inverted surfaces of the preparations vs. scanned veneers. The butt joint preparation had the best trueness out of the three groups of preparation during both comparison methods, although there was no statistically significant difference between the butt joint and feather edge groups in the CAD design vs. scanned veneers analysis. Also, there was no statistically significant difference between palatal chamfer and feather edge groups in the scanned veneers vs. inverted surfaces of the preparations analysis.
牙科正沿着数字化路径以稳定且确定的步伐稳步发展。口内扫描仪(IOS)开始提高修复体的精度和逼真度,使口腔修复治疗更具可预测性。本研究的目的是比较60个具有三种不同类型边缘线的预备体的打印临时贴面的逼真度和内部适合性。使用同一台口内扫描仪对基牙进行扫描,所得网格进行重叠并在计量软件中进行分析。比较采用两种方法进行:(1)计算机辅助设计(CAD)设计与扫描贴面;(2)预备体的倒凹面与扫描贴面。在两种比较方法中,对接接头预备体在三组预备体中具有最佳的逼真度,尽管在CAD设计与扫描贴面分析中,对接接头组和羽状边缘组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。此外,在扫描贴面与预备体倒凹面分析中,腭部倒角组和羽状边缘组之间也没有统计学上的显著差异。