Jurado Carlos A, Sadid-Zadeh Ramtin, Watanabe Hidehiko, Robbins Craig E, Afrashtehfar Kelvin I, Fischer Nicholas G, Lee Damian J
Department of Prosthodontics, The University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo, New York, USA.
J Prosthodont. 2024 Mar;33(3):281-287. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13689. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate laminate veneers (LVs) fabricated on various incisal preparation designs.
Sixty maxillary central incisors with various preparation designs were 3D-printed, 15 each, including preparation for: (1) LV with feathered-edge design; (2) LV with butt-joint design; (3) LV with palatal chamfer; and (4) full-coverage crown. Restorations were then designed and manufactured from zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) following the contour of a pre-operation scan. Restorations were bonded to the assigned preparation using resin cement and following the manufacturer's instructions. Specimens were then subjected to 10,000 thermocycles at 5 to 55°C with a dwell time of 30 s. The fracture strength of specimens was then assessed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni correction multiple comparisons were used to assess the fracture strength differences between the test groups (α = 0.001). Descriptive fractographic analysis of specimens was carried out with scanning electron microscopy images.
Complete coverage crown and LV with palatal chamfer design had the highest fracture resistance values (781.4 ± 151.4 and 618.2 ± 112.6 N, respectively). Single crown and LV with palatal chamfer had no significant difference in fracture strength (p > 05). LV with feathered-edge and butt-joint designs provided significantly (p < 05) lower fracture resistance than complete coverage crown and LV with palatal chamfer design.
The fracture resistance of chairside milled ZLS veneers was significantly influenced by the incisal preparation designs tested. Within the limitation of this study, when excessive occlusal forces are expected, LV with palatal chamfer display is the most conservative method of fabricating an indirect restoration.
本研究旨在评估在各种切端预备设计上制作的整体式氧化锆增强硅酸锂贴面(LVs)的抗折强度。
对60颗具有不同预备设计的上颌中切牙进行3D打印,每种设计15颗,包括:(1)带有羽状边缘设计的LV;(2)对接设计的LV;(3)腭侧斜面的LV;(4)全冠修复。然后根据术前扫描轮廓,用氧化锆增强硅酸锂(ZLS)设计并制作修复体。使用树脂粘结剂并按照制造商的说明将修复体粘结到指定的预备体上。然后将试件在5至55°C下进行10000次热循环,保压时间为30秒。然后使用万能试验机以1.0毫米/分钟的十字头速度评估试件的抗折强度。采用单因素方差分析和Bonferroni校正多重比较来评估试验组之间的抗折强度差异(α = 0.001)。利用扫描电子显微镜图像对试件进行描述性断口分析。
全冠修复和腭侧斜面设计的LV具有最高的抗折强度值(分别为781.4±151.4和618.2±112.6 N)。单冠修复和腭侧斜面的LV在抗折强度上无显著差异(p>0.05)。带有羽状边缘和对接设计的LV提供的抗折强度显著低于全冠修复和腭侧斜面设计的LV(p<0.05)。
椅旁铣削的ZLS贴面的抗折强度受所测试的切端预备设计的显著影响。在本研究的局限性内,当预期存在过大的咬合力时,腭侧斜面展示的LV是制作间接修复体最保守的方法。