Craus-Miguel Andrea, Munar Marc, Moyà-Alcover Gabriel, Contreras-Nogales Ana María, González-Hidalgo Manuel, Segura-Sampedro Juan José
General and Digestive Surgery Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Madrid, Spain.
PhD Program in Translational Research in Public Health and High Prevalence Diseases, Health Sciences, University of the Balearic Islands (UIB), 07122 Palma, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 23;13(24):7863. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247863.
This study assessed the feasibility and security of remote surgical wound monitoring using the RedScar© smartphone app, which employs automated diagnosis for early visual detection of infections without direct healthcare personnel involvement. Additionally, patient satisfaction with telematic care was evaluated as a secondary aim. Surgical site infection (SSI) is the second leading cause of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), leading to prolonged hospital stays, heightened patient distress, and increased healthcare costs. The study employed a prospective paired-cohort and single-blinded design, with a sample size of 47 adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery. RedScar© was used for remote telematic monitoring, evaluating the feasibility and security of this approach. A satisfaction questionnaire assessed patient experience. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05485233. Out of 47 patients, 41 successfully completed both remote and in-person follow-ups. RedScar© demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% in detecting SSIs, with a specificity of 83.13%. The kappa coefficient of 0.8171 indicated substantial agreement between the application's results and human observers. Patient satisfaction with telemonitoring was high: 97.6% believed telemonitoring reduces costs, 90.47% perceived it prevents work/school absenteeism, and 80.9% found telemonitoring comfortable. This is the first study to evaluate an automatic smartphone application on real patients for diagnosing postoperative wound infections. It establishes the safety and feasibility of telematic follow-up using the RedScar© application for surgical wound assessment. The high sensitivity suggests its utility in identifying true cases of infection, highlighting its potential role in clinical practice. Future studies are needed to address limitations and validate the efficacy of RedScar© in diverse patient populations.
本研究评估了使用RedScar©智能手机应用程序进行远程手术伤口监测的可行性和安全性,该应用程序采用自动诊断技术,无需医护人员直接参与即可早期视觉检测感染情况。此外,作为次要目标,还评估了患者对远程医疗护理的满意度。手术部位感染(SSI)是医疗相关感染(HAIs)的第二大主要原因,会导致住院时间延长、患者痛苦加剧以及医疗成本增加。本研究采用前瞻性配对队列和单盲设计,样本量为47名接受腹部手术的成年患者。使用RedScar©进行远程远程监测,评估这种方法的可行性和安全性。一份满意度问卷评估了患者的体验。该研究方案已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,标识符为NCT05485233。在47名患者中,41名成功完成了远程和亲自随访。RedScar©在检测SSI方面的灵敏度为100%,特异性为83.13%。kappa系数为0.8171,表明该应用程序的结果与人类观察者之间存在高度一致性。患者对远程监测的满意度很高:97.6%的人认为远程监测降低了成本,90.47%的人认为它可以防止缺勤/缺课,80.9%的人觉得远程监测很舒适。这是第一项在真实患者中评估用于诊断术后伤口感染的自动智能手机应用程序的研究。它确立了使用RedScar©应用程序进行手术伤口评估的远程随访的安全性和可行性。高灵敏度表明其在识别真正感染病例方面的效用,突出了其在临床实践中的潜在作用。未来需要开展研究来解决局限性并验证RedScar©在不同患者群体中的疗效。