Cuadras Mercè, Semidey Maria E, Planas Jacques, de Torres Inés M, Regis Lucas, Celma Ana, Trilla Enrique, Ramón Y Cajal Santiago, Medina Rafael A, Congregado Belén, Marcilla David, Japón Miguel A, Ramirez Miguel, Calatrava-Fons Ana, Leivar Asier, Alonso María B, García Eugenia, González-Peramato Pilar, Vazquez-Martul Dario, Concha-López Ángel, Chantada Venancio, Queipo Francisco J, Gago José L, Carrato Cristina, Luque Rafael J, Moreno-Jimenez Juan, Catalina-Fernández Inmaculada, León Cristina, Morote Juan
Urology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 17;25(24):13489. doi: 10.3390/ijms252413489.
Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the most accurate procedure for lymph node (LN) staging in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. LN sectioning and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of at least one slice remains the gold standard for LN evaluation, potentially leading to misdetection of small metastatic focus. Entire LN analysis is possible with One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) by detecting cytokeratin 19 (CK19) mRNA as a surrogate for LN invasion. This study aimed to compare postoperative performance of OSNA pooling with conventional H&E staining for pathological LN detection in PCa patients. POPCORN was an observational, prospective, and multicenter study of patients with PCa who underwent PLND. Dissected LNs were analyzed by both methods. This study included 2503 LNs from 131 patients, showing no statistically significant differences in pathological LN detection. Concordance between methods was high (93.9%), as were specificity (96.6%) and negative predictive value (96.6%) of OSNA pooling. The measure of agreement (Cohen's Kappa [κ]) was 0.70. Only eight (6.1%) discordances were observed, including four misdetections from each method. Results showed a high concordance between OSNA pooling and H&E staining, suggesting that OSNA pooling may be a good alternative to H&E staining to detect LN metastases in PCa patients.
盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)是前列腺癌(PCa)患者淋巴结(LN)分期最准确的方法。至少对一片淋巴结进行切片及苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色仍是淋巴结评估的金标准,但可能导致小转移灶的漏检。通过检测细胞角蛋白19(CK19)mRNA作为淋巴结浸润的替代指标,一步核酸扩增(OSNA)可实现对整个淋巴结的分析。本研究旨在比较PCa患者中OSNA合并检测与传统H&E染色在病理淋巴结检测方面的术后表现。POPCORN是一项对接受PLND的PCa患者进行的观察性、前瞻性多中心研究。对切除的淋巴结采用两种方法进行分析。本研究纳入了131例患者的2503个淋巴结,结果显示在病理淋巴结检测方面无统计学显著差异。两种方法之间的一致性较高(93.9%),OSNA合并检测的特异性(96.6%)和阴性预测值(96.6%)也较高。一致性度量(Cohen's Kappa[κ])为0.70。仅观察到8例(6.1%)不一致情况,每种方法各有4例假阴性。结果显示OSNA合并检测与H&E染色之间具有高度一致性,提示OSNA合并检测可能是检测PCa患者淋巴结转移的H&E染色的良好替代方法。