Suppr超能文献

抗血管内皮生长因子联合眼部类固醇疗法治疗持续性糖尿病黄斑水肿:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Combined with Ocular Steroid Therapy for Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Ma Yunxi, Tao Yunhan, Yuan Mingzhu, Sun Xufang

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jie-Fang Road, Wuhan 430030, China.

出版信息

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 23;17(12):1574. doi: 10.3390/ph17121574.

Abstract

: Our purpose was to appraise the efficacy and safety of intravitreous vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor (anti-VEGF) therapy combined with steroids for persistent diabetic macular edema. : A systematic review was conducted of the research evaluating the combination therapy of anti-VEGF and steroids for persistent diabetic macular edema compared to anti-VEGF alone. A meta-analysis was performed using a protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023476333). Continuous and binary variables were extracted. Results were expressed as the mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR). : A total of 9 trials with 537 eyes were included. The MDs of improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1/2/3/6/9/12 months between the combined and monotherapy groups were 1.33 (95% CI [-1.31,3.96]), 3.03 (95% CI [0.01, 6.06]), -0.37 (95% CI [-4.74, 4.00]), -1.37 (95% CI [-4.65, 1.91]), 1.05 (95% CI [-3.68, 5.77]), and 1.70 (95% CI [-3.52, 6.93]). The MDs concerned with a central retinal thickness (CMT) decline in at 1/2/3/6/9/12 months between the two groups were -47.33, 95% CI [-94.35, -0.32]), -89.19 (95% CI [-114.38, -64.00]), -58.84 (95% CI [-96.93, -20.74]), -57.23 (95% CI [-102.62, -11.84]), -40.59 (95% CI [-80.59, -0.58]), and -38.89 (95% CI [-77.38, -0.40]), respectively. Furthermore, the combined group obtained higher relative risks of experiencing events with high intraocular pressure and progressed cataracts. : Anti-VEGF combined with ocular steroids showed a significant advantage in improving the retinal anatomical structure compared to anti-VEGF monotherapy for persistent diabetic macular edema. However, as the treatment period extended, the combination treatment was no more effective than monotherapy after 2 months, with more severe side effects.

摘要

我们的目的是评估玻璃体内血管内皮生长因子抑制剂(抗VEGF)联合类固醇治疗持续性糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效和安全性。

对评估抗VEGF与类固醇联合治疗持续性糖尿病黄斑水肿并与单纯抗VEGF治疗进行比较的研究进行了系统评价。使用在PROSPERO(CRD42023476333)注册的方案进行荟萃分析。提取连续变量和二元变量。结果以平均差(MD)和风险比(RR)表示。

共纳入9项试验,涉及537只眼。联合治疗组与单药治疗组在1/2/3/6/9/12个月时最佳矫正视力(BCVA)改善的MD分别为1.33(95%CI[-1.31,3.96])、3.03(95%CI[0.01,6.06])、-0.37(95%CI[-4.74,4.00])、-1.37(95%CI[-4.65,1.91])、1.05(95%CI[-3.68,5.77])和1.70(95%CI[-3.52,6.93])。两组在1/2/3/6/9/12个月时视网膜中央厚度(CMT)下降的MD分别为-47.33(95%CI[-94.35,-0.32])、-89.19(95%CI[-114.38,-64.00])、-58.84(95%CI[-96.93,-20.74])、-57.23(95%CI[-102.62,-11.84])、-40.59(95%CI[-80.59,-0.58])和-38.89(95%CI[-77.38,-0.40])。此外,联合治疗组发生高眼压和白内障进展事件的相对风险更高。

对于持续性糖尿病黄斑水肿,与抗VEGF单药治疗相比,抗VEGF联合眼部类固醇在改善视网膜解剖结构方面具有显著优势。然而,随着治疗时间的延长,联合治疗在2个月后并不比单药治疗更有效,且副作用更严重。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a40/11679650/46cea2620ec6/pharmaceuticals-17-01574-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验