Suppr超能文献

定义“高含量”饱和脂肪、糖和钠,以助力美国包装食品和饮料的包装正面标签标注工作。

Defining "High-In" Saturated Fat, Sugar, and Sodium to Help Inform Front-of-Pack Labeling Efforts for Packaged Foods and Beverages in the United States.

作者信息

Dunford Elizabeth K, Miles Donna R, Hollingsworth Bridget A, Heller Samantha, Popkin Barry M, Ng Shu Wen, Taillie Lindsey Smith

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2024 Dec 17;16(24):4345. doi: 10.3390/nu16244345.

Abstract

: To help consumers make healthier choices, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been charged with developing a front-of-package label (FOPL) to appear on US packaged foods and beverages. One option being explored is the use of "high-in" FOPLs for added sugar, sodium, and saturated fat using a threshold of ≥20% of the recommended daily value (%DV) per portion/serving size to define "high-in". While research has addressed what FOPL designs are most effective at visually communicating "high-in", less attention has been paid to the nutrient profile model (NPM) used to decide which products should receive these labels. In addition, several established regional NPMs already exist that identify products that are high in nutrients of concern, but it is unclear how these compare to the FDA's %DV approach. : We used a dataset of 51,809 US products from Mintel's Global New Products Database to examine how the FDA's current definition of "high-in" compares to three established regional NPMs: the Canadian NPM, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) NPM, and Chile's NPM. : Overall agreement between the four NPMs was 51% for foods and 72% for beverages, with highest agreement in categories such as sweetened sodas (87%), and lowest agreement in categories such as bread (14%) and salty snacks (29%). The Canadian NPM showed the highest agreement to the FDA "high-in" criteria while the Chilean and PAHO models had lower agreement. For many food categories, the FDA's definition of "high-in" would require the fewest products to carry a "high-in" label. This issue was particularly pronounced in categories that tend to be served in small portions (e.g., salty snacks, bars), but disappeared or reversed for categories that are served in larger portions (e.g., frozen and non-frozen main dishes). : The NPM chosen has important policy implications for an FOPL system's ability to identify unhealthy foods and incentivize companies to reformulate products. Based on these results, the FDA should consider using a stronger NPM similar to those used elsewhere in the Americas region when deciding the final thresholds for "high-in" for US packaged foods and beverages.

摘要

为帮助消费者做出更健康的选择,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)负责制定一种将出现在美国包装食品和饮料上的包装正面标签(FOPL)。正在探索的一种选择是使用“高含量”FOPL来标注添加糖、钠和饱和脂肪,使用每份/每份食用量达到每日推荐摄入量(%DV)≥20%的阈值来定义“高含量”。虽然已有研究探讨了哪种FOPL设计在视觉上最有效地传达“高含量”信息,但对于用于决定哪些产品应贴上这些标签的营养成分模型(NPM)的关注较少。此外,已经存在几个既定的区域性NPM,它们可识别出含有令人担忧的高营养成分的产品,但尚不清楚这些与FDA的%DV方法相比如何。

我们使用了英敏特全球新产品数据库中51,809种美国产品的数据集,来研究FDA当前对“高含量”的定义与三个既定的区域性NPM相比如何:加拿大NPM、泛美卫生组织(PAHO)NPM和智利NPM。

四种NPM之间在食品方面的总体一致性为51%,在饮料方面为72%,在诸如甜味汽水等类别中一致性最高(87%),而在诸如面包(14%)和咸味小吃(29%)等类别中一致性最低。加拿大NPM与FDA的“高含量”标准一致性最高,而智利和PAHO模型的一致性较低。对于许多食品类别,FDA对“高含量”的定义要求带有“高含量”标签的产品最少。这个问题在通常以小份供应的类别(如咸味小吃、棒状食品)中尤为明显,但在以大份供应的类别(如冷冻和非冷冻主菜)中则消失或相反。

所选择的NPM对于FOPL系统识别不健康食品以及激励公司重新配方产品的能力具有重要的政策影响。基于这些结果,FDA在确定美国包装食品和饮料“高含量”的最终阈值时,应考虑使用类似于美洲地区其他地方所使用的更强有力的NPM。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28c9/11677797/b0074e3b5e02/nutrients-16-04345-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验