The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.
Carolina Population Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA.
Nutrients. 2018 Feb 24;10(2):257. doi: 10.3390/nu10020257.
Increased interest among consumers in the reduction of dietary sugar intake has led to the wider availability of food products containing non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS). However, the extent to which NNS are currently being used by manufacturers to sweeten processed food and beverage products, and how NNS may be displacing added sugars as a sweetener is unknown. The current study utilized branded food composition databases from Australia, Mexico, New Zealand and the US to determine the percentage of processed food and beverage products for which there are nutrition data containing NNS and to compare total sugar density (g per 100 mL for beverages and g per 100 g for foods) between products with and without NNS. Ordinary least squares regression at the country-product level was performed to examine associations between presence of NNS and total sugar. Across all countries, 5% of products contained at least one NNS, with the highest prevalence among beverages (22%). Mexico had the highest percentage of products with NNS (11%), as compared to the United States (US) (4%), New Zealand (1%), and Australia (<1%). The presence of NNS was associated with lower mean total sugar density among beverages (range across countries: 7.5 to 8.7 g per 100 mL) and among foods (23.2 to 25.5 g per 100 g). Products with both added sugar ingredients and NNS had a lower overall mean total sugar density when compared to products containing only added sugar ingredients. Due to paucity of data on sales and market shares across these countries, our results do not reflect the extent to which consumers purchase NNS containing products. Continued monitoring of NNS in the food supply, extension of work from these data, and inclusion of market shares of products will be important as more countries introduce policies to reduce sugar.
消费者对减少饮食中糖摄入量的兴趣日益浓厚,导致含有非营养性甜味剂(NNS)的食品越来越多。然而,制造商目前在多大程度上将 NNS 用于甜味加工食品和饮料产品,以及 NNS 作为甜味剂取代添加糖的程度如何,目前尚不清楚。本研究利用来自澳大利亚、墨西哥、新西兰和美国的品牌食品成分数据库,确定了含有 NNS 的加工食品和饮料产品的营养数据百分比,并比较了含有和不含有 NNS 的产品的总糖密度(饮料中每 100 毫升的克数和食物中每 100 克的克数)。在国家-产品层面进行普通最小二乘法回归,以检验 NNS 存在与总糖之间的关联。在所有国家中,有 5%的产品至少含有一种 NNS,其中饮料中含量最高(22%)。与美国(4%)、新西兰(1%)和澳大利亚(<1%)相比,墨西哥含有 NNS 的产品比例最高(11%)。NNS 的存在与饮料中总糖密度平均值较低有关(各国范围:7.5 至 8.7 克/100 毫升),与食物中总糖密度平均值较低有关(23.2 至 25.5 克/100 克)。与仅含有添加糖成分的产品相比,同时含有添加糖成分和 NNS 的产品的总糖密度总体平均值较低。由于这些国家的销售和市场份额数据不足,我们的结果不能反映消费者购买含 NNS 产品的程度。随着更多国家出台减少糖摄入量的政策,继续监测食品供应中的 NNS、从这些数据扩展工作以及包含产品的市场份额将非常重要。