Suppr超能文献

健康生酮饮食与能量限制饮食对肥胖成年人减肥效果的开发及实用随机对照试验

Development and Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Healthy Ketogenic Diet Versus Energy-Restricted Diet on Weight Loss in Adults with Obesity.

作者信息

Lim Su Lin, Tay Melissa, Ang Siew Min, Wai Shu Ning, Ong Kai Wen, Neo Wen Joo, Yap Qai Ven, Chan Yiong Huak, Khoo Chin Meng

机构信息

Office of Allied Health & Pharmacy, National University Hospital, Singapore 119228, Singapore.

Department of Dietetics, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074, Singapore.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2024 Dec 19;16(24):4380. doi: 10.3390/nu16244380.

Abstract

: The ketogenic diet (KD) is widely used for weight management by reducing appetite, enhancing fat oxidation, and facilitating weight loss. However, the high content of total and saturated fats in a conventional KD may elevate low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels, a known risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, highlighting the need for healthier alternatives. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a newly developed Healthy Ketogenic Diet (HKD) versus an Energy-Restricted Diet (ERD) on weight loss and metabolic outcomes among adults with obesity. : Multi-ethnic Asian adults ( = 80) with body mass index ≥ 27.5 kg/m were randomized either to HKD ( = 41) or ERD = 39) for 6 months. Both groups followed an energy-restricted healthy diet, emphasizing on reducing saturated and trans fats. The HKD group additionally limited net carbohydrate intake to no more than 50 g per day. Dietary adherence was supported via the Nutritionist Buddy app with dietitian coaching. The primary outcome was weight change from baseline at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included weight change at 3 months and 1 year, along with changes in metabolic profiles. Data were analyzed using linear regression with an intention-to-treat approach. : The HKD group achieved significantly greater mean weight loss at 6 months than the ERD group (-7.8 ± 5.2 kg vs. -4.2 ± 5.6 kg, = 0.01). The mean weight loss percentage at 6 months was 9.3 ± 5.9% and 4.9 ± 5.8% for the HKD and ERD groups, respectively ( = 0.004). Improvements in metabolic profiles were also significantly better in the HKD group [glycated hemoglobin (-0.3 ± 0.3% vs. -0.1 ± 0.2%, = 0.008), systolic blood pressure (-7.7 ± 8.9 mmHg vs. -2.6 ± 12.2 mmHg, = 0.005), and aspartate transaminase (-7.6 ± 15.5 IU/L vs. 0.6 ± 11.5 IU/L, = 0.01)], with no increase in LDL-cholesterol (-0.12 ± 0.60 mmol/L vs. -0.04 ± 0.56 mmol/L, = 0.97) observed in either group. : The HKD was more effective than the ERD in promoting weight loss and improving cardiometabolic outcomes without elevation in LDL-cholesterol. It can be recommended for therapeutic intervention in patients with obesity.

摘要

生酮饮食(KD)通过降低食欲、增强脂肪氧化和促进体重减轻,被广泛用于体重管理。然而,传统生酮饮食中总脂肪和饱和脂肪含量较高,可能会提高低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇水平,这是心血管疾病的一个已知风险因素,凸显了对更健康替代方案的需求。本研究旨在调查新开发的健康生酮饮食(HKD)与能量限制饮食(ERD)对肥胖成年人减肥和代谢结果的影响。

多民族亚洲成年人(n = 80),体重指数≥27.5 kg/m²,被随机分为HKD组(n = 41)或ERD组(n = 39),为期6个月。两组均遵循能量限制的健康饮食,强调减少饱和脂肪和反式脂肪。HKD组还将净碳水化合物摄入量限制在每天不超过50克。通过营养师助手应用程序和营养师指导来支持饮食依从性。主要结局是6个月时相对于基线的体重变化。次要结局包括3个月和1年时的体重变化以及代谢指标的变化。采用意向性分析方法,使用线性回归对数据进行分析。

HKD组在6个月时的平均体重减轻显著大于ERD组(-7.8±5.2千克 vs. -4.2±5.6千克,P = 0.01)。HKD组和ERD组在6个月时的平均体重减轻百分比分别为9.3±5.9%和4.9±5.8%(P = 0.004)。HKD组的代谢指标改善也显著更好[糖化血红蛋白(-0.3±0.3% vs. -0.1±0.2%,P = 0.008)、收缩压(-7.7±8.9 mmHg vs. -2.6±12.2 mmHg,P = 0.005)和天冬氨酸转氨酶(-7.6±15.5 IU/L vs. 0.6±11.5 IU/L,P = 0.01)],两组均未观察到LDL胆固醇升高(-0.12±0.60 mmol/L vs. -0.04±0.56 mmol/L,P = 0.97)。

HKD在促进体重减轻和改善心脏代谢结局方面比ERD更有效,且不会升高LDL胆固醇。可推荐用于肥胖患者的治疗干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8522/11677078/cebc1a0f9d38/nutrients-16-04380-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验