Ling Long, Lai Theresa, Malyala Raj
Glidewell Dental, Irvine, CA 92612, USA.
Polymers (Basel). 2024 Dec 20;16(24):3562. doi: 10.3390/polym16243562.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of a novel 3D-printing model resin and compare it to eight commercially available model resins. An experimental resin formulated by our proprietary resin technology along with DentaModel, NextDent 2, KeyModel Ultra, Rodin Model, Die and Model 2, DMR III, LCD Grey, and Grey Resin were used in this study. Parallelepiped specimens (2 × 2 × 25 mm, n = 5) were printed and measured for their flexural strength (FS), flexural modulus (FM), and modulus of resilience (MR) in accordance with ISO-4049. Dumbbell-shaped specimens (Type V, n = 5) were printed to test tensile strength (TS) and elongation according to ASTM-D638. Barcol hardness (BH) was measured based on ASTM D2583 using broken tensile strength specimens. Izod-type test specimens (3.2 × 12.7 × 63.5 mm, n = 10) were printed, notched, and determined for impact strength according to ASTM D256-10. The degree of conversion was measured using FTIR (n = 5). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests ( ≤ 0.05). The experimental resin exhibited a similar or significantly greater flexural strength (88.8 MPa), modulus of resilience (2.13 MPa), tensile strength (54.4 MPa), and hardness (82.9) than most model resins (FS 62.6-90.1 MPa, MR 1.37-2.0 MPa, TS 36.3-54.6 MPa, BH 66.1-83.7). The elongation (6.2%) and impact strength (14.2 J/m) of the experimental resin are statistically the same as those of most resins (3.0-7.5%, 13.8-16.4 J/m). However, the experimental resin has a significantly lower flexural modulus (1.97 GPa) than most resins (2.18-3.03 GPa). The experimental resin exhibited a significantly higher degree of conversion (66.58%) than most resins (1.11-62.34%) for 40 s of light curing; however, a similar or higher value (84.87%) than most resins (72.27-82.51%) was obtained for 3D-printed objects. The newly formulated 3D-printing model resin exhibited adequate mechanical properties and degree of conversion, which is comparable to the commercially available 3D-printing model resin materials. The new 3D-printing model resin can be used for modeling applications in restoration, orthodontics, implants, and other cases.
本研究的目的是评估一种新型3D打印模型树脂的力学性能和固化程度,并将其与八种市售模型树脂进行比较。本研究使用了由我们专有的树脂技术配制的实验树脂,以及DentaModel、NextDent 2、KeyModel Ultra、Rodin Model、Die and Model 2、DMR III、LCD Grey和Grey Resin。按照ISO-4049打印并测量长方体试样(2×2×25mm,n = 5)的弯曲强度(FS)、弯曲模量(FM)和回弹模量(MR)。根据ASTM-D638打印哑铃形试样(V型,n = 5)以测试拉伸强度(TS)和伸长率。使用断裂拉伸强度试样,根据ASTM D2583测量巴氏硬度(BH)。打印、开槽并根据ASTM D256-10测定伊佐德型试样(3.2×12.7×63.5mm,n = 10)的冲击强度。使用傅里叶变换红外光谱仪(FTIR,n = 5)测量固化程度。数据采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验进行分析(≤0.05)。与大多数模型树脂(FS 62.6 - 90.1MPa,MR 1.37 - 2.0MPa,TS 36.3 - 54.6MPa,BH 66.1 - 83.7)相比,实验树脂表现出相似或显著更高的弯曲强度(88.8MPa)、回弹模量(2.13MPa)、拉伸强度(54.4MPa)和硬度(82.9)。实验树脂的伸长率(6.2%)和冲击强度(14.2J/m)与大多数树脂(3.0 - 7.5%,13.8 - 16.4J/m)在统计学上相同。然而,实验树脂的弯曲模量(1.97GPa)明显低于大多数树脂(2.18 - 3.03GPa)。对于40秒的光固化,实验树脂的固化程度(66.58%)明显高于大多数树脂(1.11 - 62.34%);然而,对于3D打印物体,其固化程度与大多数树脂(72.27 - 82.51%)相似或更高(84.87%)。新配制的3D打印模型树脂表现出足够的力学性能和固化程度,与市售的3D打印模型树脂材料相当。这种新型3D打印模型树脂可用于修复、正畸、种植和其他病例的建模应用。