Bayoumy Ahmed B, Derijks Luc J J, Oldenburg Bas, de Boer Nanne K H
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pharmaceutics. 2024 Nov 22;16(12):1497. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16121497.
The introduction of biological therapies has revolutionized inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management. A critical consideration in developing these therapies is ensuring adequate drug concentrations at the site of action. While blood-based biomarkers have shown limited utility in optimizing treatment (except for TNF-alpha inhibitors and thiopurines), tissue drug concentrations may offer valuable insights. In antimicrobial therapies, tissue concentration monitoring is standard practice and could provide a new avenue for understanding the pharmacokinetics of biological and small-molecule therapies in IBD. Various methods exist for measuring tissue concentrations, including whole tissue sampling, MALDI-MSI, microdialysis, and fluorescent labeling. These techniques offer unique advantages, such as spatial drug-distribution mapping, continuous sampling, or cellular-level analysis. However, challenges remain, including sampling invasiveness, heterogeneity in tissue compartments, and a lack of standardized bioanalytical guidelines. Drug pharmacokinetics are influenced by multiple factors, including molecular properties, disease-induced changes in the gastrointestinal tract, and the timing of sample collection. For example, drug permeability, solubility, and interaction with transporters may vary between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Research into the tissue concentrations of drugs like anti-TNF agents, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and tofacitinib has shown variable correlations with clinical outcomes, suggesting potential roles for tissue concentration monitoring in therapeutic drug management. Although routine clinical application is not yet established, exploring tissue drug concentrations may enhance understanding of IBD pharmacotherapy.
生物疗法的引入彻底改变了炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗方式。开发这些疗法时的一个关键考虑因素是确保在作用部位有足够的药物浓度。虽然基于血液的生物标志物在优化治疗方面效用有限(除了肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂和硫唑嘌呤),但组织药物浓度可能提供有价值的见解。在抗菌疗法中,组织浓度监测是标准做法,并且可以为了解IBD中生物疗法和小分子疗法的药代动力学提供新途径。存在多种测量组织浓度的方法,包括全组织采样、基质辅助激光解吸电离质谱成像(MALDI-MSI)、微透析和荧光标记。这些技术具有独特的优势,例如药物空间分布图谱、连续采样或细胞水平分析。然而,挑战依然存在,包括采样的侵入性、组织隔室的异质性以及缺乏标准化的生物分析指南。药物药代动力学受多种因素影响,包括分子特性、疾病引起的胃肠道变化以及样本采集时间。例如,药物通透性、溶解度以及与转运蛋白的相互作用在克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎之间可能有所不同。对抗肿瘤坏死因子药物、乌司奴单抗、维多珠单抗和托法替布等药物的组织浓度研究表明,其与临床结果的相关性各不相同,这表明组织浓度监测在治疗药物管理中可能发挥潜在作用。尽管尚未确立常规临床应用,但探索组织药物浓度可能会增进对IBD药物治疗的理解。