Suppr超能文献

基于注视位置客观测量的生理融合角计算的比较分析

Comparative Analysis of Physiological Vergence Angle Calculations from Objective Measurements of Gaze Position.

作者信息

Krauze Linda, Panke Karola, Krumina Gunta, Pladere Tatjana

机构信息

Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Latvia, Jelgavas Street 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 22;24(24):8198. doi: 10.3390/s24248198.

Abstract

Eccentric photorefractometry is widely used to measure eye refraction, accommodation, gaze position, and pupil size. While the individual calibration of refraction and accommodation data has been extensively studied, gaze measurements have received less attention. PowerRef 3 does not incorporate individual calibration for gaze measurements, resulting in a divergent offset between the measured and expected gaze positions. To address this, we proposed two methods to calculate the physiological vergence angle based on the visual vergence data obtained from PowerRef 3. Twenty-three participants aged 25 ± 4 years viewed Maltese cross stimuli at distances of 25, 30, 50, 70, and 600 cm. The expected vergence angles were calculated considering the individual interpupillary distance at far. Our results demonstrate that the PowerRef 3 gaze data deviated from the expected vergence angles by 9.64 ± 2.73° at 25 cm and 9.25 ± 3.52° at 6 m. The kappa angle calibration method reduced the discrepancy to 3.93 ± 1.19° at 25 cm and 3.70 ± 0.36° at 600 cm, whereas the linear regression method further improved the accuracy to 3.30 ± 0.86° at 25 cm and 0.26 ± 0.01° at 600 cm. Both methods improved the gaze results, with the linear regression calibration method showing greater overall accuracy.

摘要

偏心 photorefractometry 被广泛用于测量眼睛的屈光、调节、注视位置和瞳孔大小。虽然屈光和调节数据的个体校准已经得到了广泛研究,但注视测量受到的关注较少。PowerRef 3 没有纳入注视测量的个体校准,导致测量的注视位置与预期注视位置之间存在偏差。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了两种基于从 PowerRef 3 获得的视觉聚散数据来计算生理聚散角的方法。23 名年龄在 25±4 岁的参与者在 25、30、50、70 和 600 厘米的距离观看马耳他十字刺激物。考虑到个体在远距离时的瞳孔间距,计算出预期的聚散角。我们的结果表明,PowerRef 3 的注视数据在 25 厘米处偏离预期聚散角 9.64±2.73°,在 6 米处偏离 9.25±3.52°。kappa 角校准方法将 25 厘米处的差异降低到 3.93±1.19°,在 600 厘米处降低到 3.70±0.36°,而线性回归方法进一步将 25 厘米处的精度提高到 3.30±0.86°,在 600 厘米处提高到 0.26±0.01°。两种方法都改善了注视结果,线性回归校准方法显示出更高的总体精度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745f/11678997/671fcb1a396d/sensors-24-08198-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验