Floriani Franciele, Tsujimoto Akimasa, Jurado Carlos A, Oliveira Dayane, Rojas-Rueda Silvia, Lopes Guilherme C
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Iowa College of Dentistry, Iowa, USA.
Department of Operative Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University School of Dentistry, Aichi, Japan,
Am J Dent. 2024 Dec;37(6):297-302.
To evaluate the color match and stability of single-shade resin-based composites (RBCs) in Class V restorations before and after ultra-violet light artificial aging.
Acrylic resin teeth of A1 and A3 were randomly assigned into seven groups to be restored with single-shade RBCs and universal-shade RBCs, shades A1 and A3. Standardized Class V cavities were restored using RBC and underwent accelerated aging for 480 hours. The color differences between RBC and Class V restorations for A1 and A3 were evaluated before and after artificial aging using a spectrophotometer.
All single-shade RBCs better color-matched the A1 tooth (P= 0.10 to P= 0.32), while universal-shade RBCs color better matched the A3 tooth (P= 0.03 to P= 0.87). Omnichroma was the only single-shade RBC that also color-matched the A3 tooth (P= 0.03). There was a statistically significant difference when comparing measurements before and after the aging only for Vittra APS Unique (P= 0.047) and Omnichroma (P= 0.038) and the A3 tooth.
When restoring Class V in teeth color A1, single-shade RBCs demonstrated comparable color matching to multi-shade resin composites even after 4 simulated years of service, however universal-shade RBCs were better options to restore Class V in teeth color A3.
评估V类洞修复中,单色调树脂基复合材料(RBC)在紫外线人工老化前后的颜色匹配度和稳定性。
将A1和A3色的丙烯酸树脂牙随机分为七组,分别用单色调RBC和通用色调RBC(A1和A3色)进行修复。使用RBC修复标准化的V类洞,并进行480小时的加速老化。使用分光光度计评估人工老化前后RBC与A1和A3的V类修复体之间的颜色差异。
所有单色调RBC与A1牙的颜色匹配度更好(P = 0.10至P = 0.32),而通用色调RBC与A3牙的颜色匹配度更好(P = 0.03至P = 0.87)。Omnichroma是唯一一种与A3牙颜色也匹配的单色调RBC(P = 0.03)。仅比较Vittra APS Unique(P = 0.047)和Omnichroma(P = 0.038)与A3牙老化前后的测量值时,存在统计学上的显著差异。
在修复A1色牙齿的V类洞时,即使经过4年模拟使用,单色调RBC的颜色匹配度与多色调树脂复合材料相当,然而通用色调RBC是修复A3色牙齿V类洞的更好选择。