Harris Dale M, Latella Christopher, Tripodi Nicholas, O'Bryan Steven J
Institute for Health and Sport (IHeS), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2025 Apr;39(4):321-340. doi: 10.1177/15459683241310984. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is sometimes used alongside medication to alleviate motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the evidence supporting NIBS's effectiveness for improving motor function in PD patients is uncertain. . This umbrella review aims to synthesize recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have evaluated the effectiveness of NIBS in improving motor function in people with PD, with a key focus being to examine the quality of the evidence presented. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022380544) and conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search strategy was guided by the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome framework, focusing on individuals with idiopathic PD (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-4). The review included studies comparing various NIBS techniques (eg, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation) to sham or alternative treatments, targeting motor and cognitive regions. Six databases were searched up to June 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2), and random-effects meta-analyses were performed to pool standardized mean differences (SMDs). . The final analysis included 31 meta-analyses and 10 systematic reviews. Overall, the reviews were rated as moderate quality (54% average for AMSTAR2). NIBS showed a small-to-moderate effect on motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Section III scores; SMD = -0.80), functional mobility (gait speed and timed-up-and-go; SMD = -0.39), and freezing of gait (SMD = -0.58), but no significant effect on balance. . NIBS offers small-to-moderate benefits for motor symptoms and functional movement in PD, though it does not significantly impact balance. Practitioners should consider the variety of techniques and treatment parameters before application.
非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)有时会与药物一起用于缓解帕金森病(PD)患者的运动症状。然而,支持NIBS改善PD患者运动功能有效性的证据并不确定。本伞状综述旨在综合近期评估NIBS改善PD患者运动功能有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析,重点是检查所呈现证据的质量。该综述方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42022380544)中注册,并按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南进行。搜索策略以人群、干预措施、对照和结局框架为指导,重点关注特发性PD患者(Hoehn和Yahr分期1 - 4期)。该综述纳入了比较各种NIBS技术(如重复经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激)与假刺激或替代治疗的研究,这些研究针对运动和认知区域。截至2024年6月,检索了六个数据库。使用多重系统评价评估2(AMSTAR2)评估方法学质量,并进行随机效应荟萃分析以汇总标准化均数差(SMD)。最终分析包括31项荟萃分析和10项系统评价。总体而言,这些综述被评为中等质量(AMSTAR2平均得分54%)。NIBS对运动功能(统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分得分;SMD = -0.80)、功能移动性(步速和计时起立行走测试;SMD = -0.39)和步态冻结(SMD = -0.58)有小到中等程度的影响,但对平衡无显著影响。NIBS对PD的运动症状和功能运动有小到中等程度的益处,尽管它对平衡没有显著影响。从业者在应用前应考虑各种技术和治疗参数。