Björk Jonas, Nyman Ulf, Berg Ulla, Bökenkamp Arend, Cavalier Etienne, Ebert Natalie, Eriksen Björn O, Derain Dubourg Laurence, Goffin Karolien, Grubb Anders, Hansson Magnus, Larsson Anders, Lemoine Sandrine, Littmann Karin, Mariat Christophe, Melsom Toralf, Schaeffner Elke, Sundin Per-Ola, Åsling-Monemi Kajsa, Delanaye Pierre, Pottel Hans
Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Clinical Studies Sweden, Forum South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2024 Nov-Dec;84(7-8):577-583. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2024.2441280. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
The aim of the present study was to extend the creatinine-based Lund-Malmö GFR equation for use with rescaled cystatin C (r-LMR) and validate it against measured GFR (mGFR) in the EKFC cystatin C cohort of children ( = 2,293) and adults ( = 7,727). Rescaling was obtained by dividing each biomarker by a Q-value, representing the population-specific median biomarker level among healthy individuals. Validation included median bias/precision/accuracy (percent estimates within ±30% of mGFR, P). Performance was compared with the EKFC-equation (EKFC), the CAPA cystatin C equation, the corresponding equations based on rescaled creatinine (r-LMR and EKFC) and the arithmetic mean of r-LMR and CAPA (r-LMR+CAPA), r-LMR and r-LMR (r-LMR), and EKFC and EKFC (EKFC). The overall P of r-LMR in adults was 86.2% (95% CI 85.4%-86.9%), which was 6.6 percentage points (pp; 95% CI 5.8-7.4 pp) higher than for CAPA and similar to r-LMR (P 87.4%, 95% CI 86.6%-88.1%). r-LMR and EKFC exhibited similar performance both overall and across subgroups of age, sex, GFR and BMI and in children. All three arithmetic mean equations had similar P-accuracy and generally performed better than the corresponding single-marker equations. Our results show that the Lund-Malmö GFR equation can be adapted for use with rescaled cystatin C with performance that is similar to the best-performing equations based on rescaled creatinine. The generality of the applied biomarker rescaling principle implies that the future demand for population- and biomarker-specific GFR estimating equations can be expected to decrease substantially.
本研究的目的是扩展基于肌酐的隆德 - 马尔默肾小球滤过率(GFR)方程,使其适用于重新标度的胱抑素C(r - LMR),并在儿童(n = 2293)和成人(n = 7727)的EKFC胱抑素C队列中,根据测量的GFR(mGFR)对其进行验证。重新标度是通过将每个生物标志物除以一个Q值来实现的,该Q值代表健康个体中特定人群的生物标志物中位数水平。验证包括中位数偏差/精密度/准确性(mGFR的±30%范围内的估计百分比,P)。将其性能与EKFC方程(EKFC)、CAPA胱抑素C方程、基于重新标度肌酐的相应方程(r - LMR和EKFC)以及r - LMR和CAPA的算术平均值(r - LMR + CAPA)、r - LMR和r - LMR(r - LMR)以及EKFC和EKFC(EKFC)进行比较。成人中r - LMR的总体P值为86.2%(95%CI 85.4% - 86.9%),比CAPA高6.6个百分点(pp;95%CI 5.8 - 7.4 pp),与r - LMR相似(P 87.4%,95%CI 86.6% - 88.1%)。r - LMR和EKFC在总体以及年龄、性别、GFR和BMI亚组以及儿童中均表现出相似的性能。所有三个算术平均方程具有相似的P准确性,并且总体上比相应的单标志物方程表现更好。我们的结果表明,隆德 - 马尔默GFR方程可以适用于重新标度的胱抑素C,其性能与基于重新标度肌酐的最佳性能方程相似。所应用的生物标志物重新标度原则的通用性意味着,未来对特定人群和生物标志物的GFR估计方程的需求预计将大幅下降。