Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜根治性胃切除术患者的横突间阻滞与肋下腹横肌平面阻滞:一项前瞻性随机对照试验

Intertransverse process block versus subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Chen Qian, Zhou Xinyue, Wang Fang, Zeng Yang, Qian Bin, Du Haiyun

机构信息

The Yancheng Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, No 166 Yulong Road, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Yancheng, No 166 Yulong Road, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02884-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy has been reported to be associated with substantial trauma and pain. This study compared the impact of ultrasound-(US)-guided, bilateral, double-injection intertransverse process block (ITPB) on postoperative analgesia with subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in patients who were undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients who were undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy surgery under general anesthesia were included. These patients were randomized to either the ITPB group or the TAPB group. Patients in the ITPB group received a double-shot US-guided bilateral ITPB at the thoracic level T6/7 and T9/10 level using ropivacaine (0.3%, 15 mL). Patients in the TAPB group received bilateral subcostal TAPB one injection per side using ropivacaine (0.3%, 30 mL). All patients used a BIS-guided combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia. The primary outcome was defined as postoperative morphine-equivalent consumption during the first 24 h.

RESULTS

The study recruited 62 patients (31 in each group) for the analysis. A comparatively less postoperative opioid consumption was observed in the ITPB group compared with the subcostal TAPB group within the first 24 h postoperatively (mean [standard deviation-(SD)] morphine-equivalent dose): 27.8 (5.7) mg vs 31.2 (4.4) mg, P < 0.001. The ITPB group showed lower intraoperative opioid use, and statistical significantly lower scores at rest and coughing at 6, 24 h postoperatively. The time to first requiring rescue analgesia was longer in the ITPB group than the subcostal TAPB group (median [IQR]): 8.0 [8.0] vs 6.0 [6.0] h, P = 0.009. The patients in the ITPB group exhibited earlier independent movement, lower incidence of postoperative complications and higher levels of satisfaction (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the double-shot bilateral ITPB could reduce opioids consumption and achieve longer and better pain relief. Additionally, it promoted early postoperative activity and improved patient satisfaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2300072986. Registered 29 June 2023.

摘要

背景

据报道,腹腔镜根治性胃切除术会带来较大的创伤和疼痛。本研究比较了超声引导下双侧双注射横突间阻滞(ITPB)与肋下腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)对接受腹腔镜根治性胃切除术患者术后镇痛的影响。

方法

纳入62例在全身麻醉下接受腹腔镜根治性胃切除术的患者。这些患者被随机分为ITPB组或TAPB组。ITPB组患者在T6/7和T9/10胸椎水平接受超声引导下双侧双注射ITPB,使用罗哌卡因(0.3%,15 mL)。TAPB组患者接受双侧肋下TAPB,每侧注射一次,使用罗哌卡因(0.3%,30 mL)。所有患者均采用脑电双频指数(BIS)引导的静吸复合麻醉。主要结局定义为术后24小时内吗啡当量的消耗量。

结果

本研究纳入62例患者(每组31例)进行分析。术后24小时内,ITPB组的术后阿片类药物消耗量低于肋下TAPB组(平均[标准差(SD)]吗啡当量剂量):27.8(5.7)mg对31.2(4.4)mg,P<0.001。ITPB组术中阿片类药物使用量较低,术后6小时和24小时静息及咳嗽时的疼痛评分显著较低。ITPB组首次需要补救镇痛的时间比肋下TAPB组长(中位数[四分位间距]):8.0[8.0]对6.0[6.0]小时,P=0.009。ITPB组患者活动恢复更早,术后并发症发生率更低,满意度更高(P=0.021)。

结论

本研究表明,双侧双注射ITPB可减少阿片类药物的消耗,实现更长时间、更好的疼痛缓解。此外,它还促进了术后早期活动,提高了患者满意度。

试验注册

ChiCTR2300072986。于2023年6月29日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7b/11706037/d455f6e18181/12871_2024_2884_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验