Suppr超能文献

能否组织家庭护理工作以促进工人的肌肉骨骼健康?戈尔迪护理集群随机对照试验的结果。

Can home care work be organized to promote musculoskeletal health for workers? Results from the GoldiCare cluster randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Lohne Fredrik Klæboe, Fimland Marius Steiro, Palarea-Albaladejo Javier, Mathiassen Svend Erik, Holtermann Andreas, Redzovic Skender

机构信息

Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Edvard Griegs gate 8, Trondheim, 7030, Norway.

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12133-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Workers in home care have high sick leave rates, predominantly because of musculoskeletal pain. The Goldilocks Work Principle proposes that health should be promoted by a "just right" composition of work tasks. Weekly workloads differ substantially between home care workers, suggesting that certain workers may have workloads that are too high, impacting their musculoskeletal health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a "GoldiCare" intervention redistributing weekly workloads to become more equal among the homecare workers. Outcomes were pain in the neck/shoulder and lower back, and the implementation of the intervention was also evaluated.

METHODS

A 16-week cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted with 125 workers from 11 home care units, divided into six intervention units and five control units. The operation coordinators of each intervention unit were educated in the Goldilocks Work Principle and provided with a planning tool to facilitate an even distribution of high care need clients. The control group continued their usual work. Primary outcomes were pain intensity in the neck/shoulder and lower back (0 to 10). Secondary outcomes included fatigue (0 to 10), composition of physical behaviors and postures (accelerometers), adherence to the intervention (weekly usage rates of the planning tool), and performance of the intervention (percentage of workers with an even distribution of workload).

RESULTS

The analysis showed no difference between the intervention and control groups in change in lower back pain (0.07, 95%CI[-0.29;0.43]), neck/shoulder pain (-0.06, 95%CI[-0.49;0.36]) or fatigue (0.04, 95%CI[-0.52;0.61]. No significant changes were observed in the composition of physical behaviors (p = 0.067) or postures (p = 0.080-0.131) between the two groups. The intervention was succesfully implemented in three units of the six, with adherence ranging from 82-100% across the intervention period. The remaining three units had an adherence of 0-47%. No improvement in performance was observed.

CONCLUSION

No significant intervention effects were observed on musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, or the composition of physical behaviors and postures. The findings suggest that the intervention was not adequately implemented within the organization. Consequently, we cannot discern whether the lack of positive results were due to poor implementation or an ineffective intervention. Results thus highlight the need for a more comprehensive understanding of organizational structures within home care to facilitate more effective implementations. The hypothetical effectiveness of a fully implemented intervention remains unknown.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05487027, submitted: 03/08/2022.

摘要

背景

家庭护理工作者的病假率很高,主要原因是肌肉骨骼疼痛。“金发姑娘工作原则”提出,应通过“恰到好处”的工作任务组合来促进健康。家庭护理工作者的每周工作量差异很大,这表明某些工作者的工作量可能过高,影响了他们的肌肉骨骼健康。本研究的目的是评估一种“GoldiCare”干预措施的效果,该措施旨在重新分配每周工作量,使家庭护理工作者之间的工作量更加均衡。评估的结果包括颈部/肩部和下背部的疼痛,同时也对干预措施的实施情况进行了评估。

方法

对来自11个家庭护理单位的125名工作者进行了一项为期16周的整群随机对照试验,分为6个干预组和5个对照组。每个干预组的运营协调员接受了“金发姑娘工作原则”的培训,并获得了一种规划工具,以促进对高护理需求客户的均匀分配。对照组继续他们的常规工作。主要结果是颈部/肩部和下背部的疼痛强度(0至10级)。次要结果包括疲劳(0至10级)、身体行为和姿势的构成(加速度计)、对干预措施的依从性(规划工具的每周使用率)以及干预措施的执行情况(工作量分配均匀的工作者百分比)。

结果

分析显示,干预组和对照组在下背部疼痛的变化(0.07,95%置信区间[-0.29;0.43])、颈部/肩部疼痛(-0.06,95%置信区间[-0.49;0.36])或疲劳(0.04,95%置信区间[-0.52;0.61])方面没有差异。两组之间在身体行为(p = 0.067)或姿势(p = 0.080 - 0.131)的构成上没有观察到显著变化。在六个干预组中的三个组成功实施了干预措施,在整个干预期内依从率为82 - 100%。其余三个组的依从率为0 - 47%。未观察到执行情况的改善。

结论

在肌肉骨骼疼痛、疲劳或身体行为和姿势的构成方面未观察到显著的干预效果。研究结果表明,该干预措施在组织内未得到充分实施。因此,我们无法确定缺乏积极结果是由于实施不力还是干预措施无效。结果因此凸显了更全面了解家庭护理组织结构以促进更有效实施的必要性。完全实施的干预措施的假设有效性仍然未知。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT05487027,提交日期:2022年8月3日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28f8/11708094/980f680526f0/12913_2024_12133_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验