• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威居家护理工作者体力工作需求评估:使用可穿戴传感器技术的观察性研究。

Assessment of Physical Work Demands of Home Care Workers in Norway: An Observational Study Using Wearable Sensor Technology.

机构信息

Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Health Research, SINTEF DIGITAL, SINTEF AS, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Nov 15;66(9):1187-1198. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac052.

DOI:10.1093/annweh/wxac052
PMID:35959647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9664225/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

High physical work demands are believed to be partly responsible for the high sickness absence among home care workers, but no studies have assessed their physical work demands using precise device-based measurements. Hence, the objective of this observational study was to assess physical work demands in home care, using wearable sensors.

METHODS

From six home care units in a large municipality in Norway, 114 of 195 eligible home care workers filled in a questionnaire, a diary about work hours, and wore five accelerometers, and a heart rate sensor for up to six consecutive workdays.

RESULTS

On average, the homecare workers spent 50% of the working hours sitting, 25.2% standing, 11.4% moving, 8.3% walking fast, 1.9% walking slow, 1.2% stair-climbing, 0.3% cycling, and 0.05% running. We found the following exposures to demanding postures: arm-elevation in an upright body position ≥30° was 36.7%, ≥60° was 4.1%, and ≥90°was 0.5%; forward trunk inclination in an upright body position ≥30° was 9.9%, ≥60° was 4%, and ≥90° was 1%; and for kneeling it was 0.8%. We found the average cardiovascular load (%heart rate reserve) during work to be 28%. There was considerable individual variation in these physical exposures at work.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents precise information on various physical work demands of home care workers in Norway. Home care workers spent on average half the workday sitting and the remaining time in various occupational physical activities. Presently, few device-based exposure limits have been proposed for acceptable amounts of occupational physical exposures, but the level of arm-elevation, forward trunk inclination, and the considerable variation of physical workloads among home care workers, indicate that preventive measures should be taken.

摘要

目的

高体力工作需求被认为是导致家庭保健工作者高病假率的部分原因,但尚无研究使用精确的基于设备的测量方法来评估其体力工作需求。因此,本观察性研究的目的是使用可穿戴传感器评估家庭保健中的体力工作需求。

方法

在挪威一个大市的六个家庭保健单位中,195 名符合条件的家庭保健工作者中有 114 名填写了一份问卷、一份关于工作时间的日记,并佩戴了五个加速度计和一个心率传感器,连续工作六天。

结果

平均而言,家庭保健工作者 50%的工作时间坐着,25.2%站着,11.4%移动,8.3%快走,1.9%慢走,1.2%爬楼梯,0.3%骑自行车,0.05%跑步。我们发现以下暴露于高要求姿势:手臂抬高至直立姿势≥30°的比例为 36.7%,≥60°的比例为 4.1%,≥90°的比例为 0.5%;直立姿势时,前躯干倾斜≥30°的比例为 9.9%,≥60°的比例为 4%,≥90°的比例为 1%;而跪着的比例为 0.8%。我们发现工作期间的平均心血管负荷(%心率储备)为 28%。这些工作中的体力暴露个体差异很大。

结论

本研究提供了关于挪威家庭保健工作者各种体力工作需求的精确信息。家庭保健工作者平均每天有一半的工作时间坐着,其余时间从事各种职业体力活动。目前,针对可接受的职业体力暴露量,提出的基于设备的暴露限制很少,但手臂抬高、前躯干倾斜和家庭保健工作者体力工作量的相当大的差异表明,应采取预防措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc2/9664225/8a4cc308b2b0/wxac052f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc2/9664225/21a88548b572/wxac052f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc2/9664225/7630f0311273/wxac052f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc2/9664225/8e163d7f0529/wxac052f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc2/9664225/8a4cc308b2b0/wxac052f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc2/9664225/21a88548b572/wxac052f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc2/9664225/7630f0311273/wxac052f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc2/9664225/8e163d7f0529/wxac052f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc2/9664225/8a4cc308b2b0/wxac052f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of Physical Work Demands of Home Care Workers in Norway: An Observational Study Using Wearable Sensor Technology.挪威居家护理工作者体力工作需求评估:使用可穿戴传感器技术的观察性研究。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Nov 15;66(9):1187-1198. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac052.
2
Physical Work Demands of Maintenance Workers on Onshore Petroleum Facilities in Norway: An Observational Study Utilizing Wearable Sensor Technology.挪威陆上石油设施维护工人的体力工作需求:一项利用可穿戴传感器技术的观察性研究。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Jul 6;67(6):706-719. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad022.
3
Association between musculoskeletal pain and exposures to awkward postures during work: a compositional analysis approach.肌肉骨骼疼痛与工作中姿势别扭暴露之间的关联:一种成分分析方法。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Jun 6;68(5):522-534. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae027.
4
Physical Work Demands of Childcare Workers in Denmark: Device-Based Measurements and Workplace Observations Among 199 Childcare Workers from 16 Day Nurseries.丹麦儿童保育员的体力工作需求:16 家日托中心的 199 名保育员的基于设备的测量和工作场所观察。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2020 Jul 1;64(6):586-595. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa041.
5
The objectively measured physical work demands and physical capacity of offshore wind technicians: An observational field study.海上风电技术人员的客观测量体力工作需求和体能:一项观察性现场研究。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jul;102:103716. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103716. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
6
Is patients' activities of daily living self-care score in Norwegian home care a proxy for workers standing at work?挪威家庭护理中患者日常生活活动自理评分是否可作为工人站立工作的替代指标?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 9;24(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10897-1.
7
Characterizing Exposure to Physical Risk Factors during Veterinary Surgery with Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study.使用可穿戴传感器描述兽医手术中的物理风险因素暴露情况:一项初步研究。
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2022 Jul-Sep;10(3):151-160. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2022.2117252. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
8
Associations between trunk flexion and physical activity of patient care workers for a single shift: A pilot study.患者护理人员单次轮班期间躯干屈曲与身体活动之间的关联:一项试点研究。
Work. 2017;56(2):247-255. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172481.
9
Physically demanding workloads and the risks of musculoskeletal disorders in homecare workers in the USA.美国家庭保健工作者的体力劳动负荷和肌肉骨骼疾病风险。
Health Soc Care Community. 2010 Sep;18(5):445-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00916.x. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
10
Agreement between an expert-rated mini job exposure matrix of occupational biomechanical exposures to the lower body and technical measurements or observation: a method comparison study.专家评估的下肢职业生物力学暴露微型工作负荷矩阵与技术测量或观察之间的一致性:方法比较研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 5;12(12):e064035. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064035.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational physical demands in eldercare workers: a systematic scoping review of studies reporting quantitative data.老年护理工作者的职业体力需求:对报告定量数据的研究进行的系统范围综述
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05962-4.
2
Sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: A prospective cohort study.因肌肉骨骼疾病导致的病假:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jul 6;9:100376. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100376. eCollection 2025 Dec.
3
Reorganization of work schedules for better distribution of work demands in home health care - a feasibility study.

本文引用的文献

1
Classification of kneeling and squatting in workers wearing protective equipment: development and validation of a rule-based model using wireless triaxial accelerometers.佩戴防护装备的工人中跪姿和蹲姿的分类:使用无线三轴加速度计的基于规则模型的开发与验证
Ergonomics. 2022 Oct;65(10):1410-1420. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2039410. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
2
How does accelerometry-measured arm elevation at work influence prospective risk of long-term sickness absence?工作中加速度计测量的手臂抬高程度如何影响长期病假的预期风险?
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Mar 1;48(2):137-147. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4000. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
3
家庭医疗保健工作时间表的重新安排以更好地分配工作需求——一项可行性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12746-1.
4
Low back pain and work-related factors among home health care workers with self-governing or conventional team structure - a natural experiment with a cross-sectional design.具有自主或传统团队结构的家庭医护人员的腰痛与工作相关因素——一项采用横断面设计的自然实验
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2025 Apr;98(3):331-341. doi: 10.1007/s00420-025-02134-x. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
5
"It's a good idea, but…": a qualitative evaluation of the GoldiCare intervention in Norwegian home care services.“这是个好主意,但是……”:对挪威家庭护理服务中戈迪护理干预措施的定性评估
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jan 20;4:1511772. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1511772. eCollection 2024.
6
Can home care work be organized to promote musculoskeletal health for workers? Results from the GoldiCare cluster randomized controlled trial.能否组织家庭护理工作以促进工人的肌肉骨骼健康?戈尔迪护理集群随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12133-2.
7
The Use of Wearable Systems for Assessing Work-Related Risks Related to the Musculoskeletal System-A Systematic Review.使用可穿戴系统评估与肌肉骨骼系统相关的工作风险——一项系统综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 26;21(12):1567. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121567.
8
Is patients' activities of daily living self-care score in Norwegian home care a proxy for workers standing at work?挪威家庭护理中患者日常生活活动自理评分是否可作为工人站立工作的替代指标?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 9;24(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10897-1.
9
Association between musculoskeletal pain and exposures to awkward postures during work: a compositional analysis approach.肌肉骨骼疼痛与工作中姿势别扭暴露之间的关联:一种成分分析方法。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Jun 6;68(5):522-534. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae027.
10
Can home care work be organized to promote health among the workers while maintaining productivity? An investigation into stakeholders' perspectives on organizational work redesign concepts based on the Goldilocks Work principles.家庭护理工作能否组织起来,在保持生产力的同时促进工人的健康?基于 Goldilocks 工作原则,对利益相关者对组织工作再设计概念的看法进行调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 21;23(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09691-2.
The physical activity paradox in cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: the contemporary Copenhagen General Population Study with 104 046 adults.
体力活动悖论与心血管疾病和全因死亡率:当代哥本哈根普通人群研究,涉及 104046 名成年人。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 14;42(15):1499-1511. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab087.
4
The effect of occupational exposure to ergonomic risk factors on osteoarthritis of hip or knee and selected other musculoskeletal diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury.职业性接触人体工程学风险因素对髋或膝关节骨关节炎和某些其他肌肉骨骼疾病的影响:来自世卫组织/劳工组织联合疾病和损伤工作相关负担估算的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Environ Int. 2021 May;150:106349. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106349. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
5
The prevalence of occupational exposure to ergonomic risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury.职业接触人体工效学风险因素的流行率:来自世卫组织/国际劳工组织工作相关疾病和伤害负担联合估算的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Environ Int. 2021 Jan;146:106157. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106157. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
6
The Relation between Domain-Specific Physical Behaviour and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Cross-Sectional Compositional Data Analysis on the Physical Activity Health Paradox Using Accelerometer-Assessed Data.特定领域身体活动行为与心肺功能适应性之间的关系:基于加速度计评估数据的体力活动健康悖论的跨截面组合数据分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 29;17(21):7929. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217929.
7
The physical activity paradox revisited: a prospective study on compositional accelerometer data and long-term sickness absence.重新审视体力活动悖论:基于组合加速度计数据的前瞻性研究与长期病假。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jul 20;17(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00988-7.
8
Occupational Risk in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.职业性膝关节骨关节炎风险:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Sep;72(9):1213-1223. doi: 10.1002/acr.24333.
9
Physical Work Demands of Childcare Workers in Denmark: Device-Based Measurements and Workplace Observations Among 199 Childcare Workers from 16 Day Nurseries.丹麦儿童保育员的体力工作需求:16 家日托中心的 199 名保育员的基于设备的测量和工作场所观察。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2020 Jul 1;64(6):586-595. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa041.
10
Detection of kneeling and squatting during work using wireless triaxial accelerometers.使用无线三轴加速度计检测工作中的跪姿和蹲姿。
Ergonomics. 2020 May;63(5):607-617. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1734668. Epub 2020 Mar 5.