• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术专家/临床用户/患者小组(TECUPP):在患者报告测量指标开发中以患者及家属的观点为核心

The technical expert/clinical user/patient panel (TECUPP): centering patient and family perspectives in patient-reported measure development.

作者信息

Marsolais Elizabeth, Anhang Price Rebecca, Berdahl Carl T, Shenk Anton, Schulson Lucy, O'Hanlon Claire E

机构信息

RAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

RAND, Arlington, VA, USA.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jan 7;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00661-4.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-024-00661-4
PMID:39773685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11708192/
Abstract

Patient and caregiver perspectives are increasingly incorporated into health care research and policymaking, but their inclusion in the quality measure development process often is not robust. We describe a stakeholder panel model for incorporating patient/caregiver voices in the development of patient-reported measures, the Technical Expert/Clinical User/Patient Panel (TECUPP) model. This model is characterized by significant or equal representation of people with lived experience of the disease or condition (as patients or caregivers) to the clinicians and others with technical expertise who typically comprise technical expert panels. We report key design features of the TECUPP model and how we used this model to develop survey-based patient experience measures of timeliness of cancer diagnosis. We describe benefits and challenges of using the TECUPP model and considerations to guide others who might use it as part of developing patient-centered quality measures, based on our experience convening a TECUPP to inform development of a patient-reported measure on timeliness of cancer diagnosis. Benefits include creating space for significant contributions from patients/caregivers and development of a shared understanding of patient experiences and observability of measure domains between clinicians and patients/caregivers. Challenges include time management and managing conversations outside the project scope. Measure development efforts implementing this model should consider recruiting diverse individuals, scheduling short and frequent meetings, enabling participation from all TECUPP members, developing accessible pre-read materials, anchoring meetings with patient stories, and encouraging multiple communication modes. The TECUPP model promotes discussion and understanding by patients/caregivers and clinicians/measure experts helpful for development of survey-based patient-reported measures.

摘要

患者及照护者的观点越来越多地被纳入医疗保健研究和政策制定中,但在质量指标制定过程中纳入这些观点的方式往往不够完善。我们描述了一种利益相关者小组模型,即技术专家/临床用户/患者小组(TECUPP)模型,用于在患者报告指标的制定过程中纳入患者/照护者的意见。该模型的特点是,患有该疾病或病症的患者或照护者在其中的代表性显著或与临床医生及其他具有专业技术知识的人员相当,而后者通常构成技术专家小组。我们报告了TECUPP模型的关键设计特征,以及我们如何使用该模型来制定基于调查的癌症诊断及时性患者体验指标。基于我们召集TECUPP以指导制定癌症诊断及时性患者报告指标的经验,我们描述了使用TECUPP模型的益处和挑战,以及指导其他可能将其用于制定以患者为中心的质量指标的考虑因素。益处包括为患者/照护者的重大贡献创造空间,促进临床医生与患者/照护者之间对患者体验形成共同理解,并使指标领域具有可观察性。挑战包括时间管理以及处理项目范围之外的对话。实施该模型的指标制定工作应考虑招募多样化的人员,安排简短且频繁的会议,确保所有TECUPP成员都能参与,准备易于理解的预读材料,以患者故事为会议切入点,并鼓励采用多种沟通方式。TECUPP模型促进了患者/照护者与临床医生/指标专家之间的讨论和理解,有助于制定基于调查的患者报告指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a363/11708192/c54f55754e16/40900_2024_661_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a363/11708192/c54f55754e16/40900_2024_661_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a363/11708192/c54f55754e16/40900_2024_661_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The technical expert/clinical user/patient panel (TECUPP): centering patient and family perspectives in patient-reported measure development.技术专家/临床用户/患者小组(TECUPP):在患者报告测量指标开发中以患者及家属的观点为核心
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jan 7;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00661-4.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Involving carer advisors in evidence synthesis to improve carers' mental health during end-of-life home care: co-production during COVID-19 remote working.让护理顾问参与证据综合工作以改善临终居家护理期间护理人员的心理健康:新冠疫情远程工作期间的共同制作。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;13(8):1-48. doi: 10.3310/TGHH6428.
4
Patient and Caregiver Prioritization of Palliative and End-of-Life Cancer Care Quality Measures.患者和照护者对姑息治疗和临终癌症护理质量措施的优先排序。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(6):1429-1435. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07041-8. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Developing catalyst films of health experiences: an analysis of a robust multi-stakeholder involvement journey.开发健康体验的催化剂薄膜:对一个稳健的多利益相关者参与过程的分析。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jul 29;8(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00369-3.
7
A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method.一项反映社区利益相关者不同观点的肺癌研究议程:SEED方法的过程与成果
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 11;5:3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y. eCollection 2019.
8
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
9
Meeting social welfare legal needs in end-of-life care: co-creation of a system-wide research partnership.满足临终关怀中的社会福利法律需求:全系统研究伙伴关系的共同创建。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 11:1-21. doi: 10.3310/YGRA9852.
10
Service user reflections on the impact of involvement in research.服务使用者对参与研究的影响的反思。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Mar 26;4:11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0095-1. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing best practice principles for the provision of programs and services to people transitioning from custody to the community: study protocol for a modified Delphi consensus exercise.为从监管环境过渡到社区的人员提供方案和服务制定最佳实践原则:一项修改后的德尔菲共识研究协议。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 2;13(6):e067366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067366.
2
Development of a self-management support practice framework for addressing cancer-related fatigue: a modified Delphi study.制定癌症相关疲劳自我管理支持实践框架:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Jun;18(3):972-982. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01348-7. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
Patient-Reported Quality Measures for Palliative Care: The Time is now.
患者报告的姑息治疗质量衡量指标:现在是时候了。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Feb;65(2):87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
4
Existing guidance on reporting of consensus methodology: a systematic review to inform ACCORD guideline development.现有共识方法报告指南:为 ACCORD 指南制定提供信息的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 8;12(9):e065154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065154.
5
A comprehensive mobility discharge assessment framework for older adults transitioning from hospital-to-home in the community-What mobility factors are critical to include? Protocol for an international e-Delphi study.面向社区从医院返家的老年患者的综合移动性出院评估框架-哪些移动性因素是必须纳入的?一项国际电子德尔菲研究方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0267470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267470. eCollection 2022.
6
Common methods of determining meaningful change in clinical practice: implications for precision patient-reported outcomes.临床实践中确定有意义变化的常用方法:对精准患者报告结局的启示。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1231-1238. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03246-4. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
7
Stakeholder-driven principles for advancing equity through shared measurement.利益相关者驱动的原则,通过共同衡量来促进公平。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec;57 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):291-303. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14031. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
8
Filling a gap in safety metrics: development of a patient-centred framework to identify and categorise patient-reported breakdowns related to the diagnostic process in ambulatory care.填补安全指标的空白:开发以患者为中心的框架,以识别和分类与门诊护理中的诊断过程相关的患者报告的故障。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jul;31(7):526-540. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013672. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
9
Incorporating the Patient and Caregiver Voice in Palliative Care Quality Measure Development.将患者及照护者的意见纳入姑息治疗质量指标的制定过程
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Feb;63(2):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
10
Domains to Be Considered for the Core Outcome Set of Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results From a 3-round Delphi Survey.需要考虑的轴性脊柱关节炎核心结局集领域:来自 3 轮 Delphi 调查的结果。
J Rheumatol. 2021 Dec;48(12):1810-1814. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.210206. Epub 2021 Aug 1.