• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Is a one-size-fits-all '12-month rule' appropriate when it comes to the last search date in systematic reviews?

作者信息

Stokes Gillian, Sutcliffe Katy, Thomas James

机构信息

Social Research Institute, EPPI Centre, University College London, London, UK

Social Research Institute, EPPI Centre, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Nov 22;28(6):359-363. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112060.

DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112060
PMID:36600443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10715459/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2719/10715459/f9f5a387e156/bmjebm-2022-112060f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2719/10715459/9af89f609903/bmjebm-2022-112060f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2719/10715459/f9f5a387e156/bmjebm-2022-112060f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2719/10715459/9af89f609903/bmjebm-2022-112060f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2719/10715459/f9f5a387e156/bmjebm-2022-112060f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Is a one-size-fits-all '12-month rule' appropriate when it comes to the last search date in systematic reviews?在系统评价中，对于末次检索日期采用一刀切的“12个月规则”是否合适？
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Nov 22;28(6):359-363. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112060.
2
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products.为系统评价产品创办一份新期刊。
Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 9;1:1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-1.
3
Comparison of information sources used in Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews: A case study in the field of anesthesiology and pain.Cochrane 系统评价与非 Cochrane 系统评价中信息来源的比较：以麻醉学和疼痛领域为例的一项研究。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Dec;10(4):597-605. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1375. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
4
Living systematic review: new inputs and challenges.系统综述更新：新的投入和挑战。
Medwave. 2020 Dec 23;20(11):e8092. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2020.11.8092.
5
No limitations to language, date, publication type, and publication status in search step of systematic reviews.在系统评价的检索步骤中，对语言、日期、出版物类型和出版状态没有限制。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May;133:165-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
6
Are systematic reviews up-to-date at the time of publication?发表时系统评价是否为最新？
Syst Rev. 2013 May 28;2:36. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-36.
7
Eligibility criteria in systematic reviews: A methodological review.系统评价中的纳入标准：方法学综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jul;52(7):1269-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
8
Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol.系统评价实施、报告、出版和评价方法的指南：范围综述方案。
F1000Res. 2021 Aug 13;10:802. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.55108.1. eCollection 2021.
9
International collaboration in conducting systematic reviews: the Cochrane Collaborative Review Group on HIV Infection and AIDS.开展系统评价的国际合作：Cochrane 艾滋病毒感染与艾滋病协作审查小组
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002 Jul 1;30 Suppl 1:S56-61.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.护理机构中预防老年人跌倒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 20;8:CD016064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016064.
2
A New Process Model of Study Identification Specific to the Identification of Randomised Studies for Systematic Reviews of Medical Interventions.一种专门用于医学干预系统评价中随机研究识别的新型研究识别过程模型。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 Apr 13;3(3):e70026. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70026. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Grief, bereavement and prolonged grief disorder: scoping and mapping the evidence.

本文引用的文献

1
Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency.大多数已发表的关于瑞德西韦治疗 COVID-19 的系统评价都是多余的，且缺乏时效性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;146:22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
2
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架：对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
3
Characteristics, quality and volume of the first 5 months of the COVID-19 evidence synthesis infodemic: a meta-research study.
悲伤、丧亲之痛与持续性悲伤障碍：证据的范围界定与梳理
BJPsych Open. 2025 Jul 11;11(4):e149. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.10050.
4
Education strategies are the most commonly used in pediatric rehabilitation implementation research: a scoping review.教育策略是儿科康复实施研究中最常用的：一项范围综述。
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jan 7;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00690-w.
5
Features of effective hospital fall prevention trials: an intervention component analysis.有效预防医院跌倒试验的特征：干预成分分析
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):1023. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05587-w.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施：系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Qualitative Comparative Analysis of exercise interventions for fall prevention in residential aged care facilities.居住型养老机构中预防跌倒的运动干预的定性比较分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05246-0.
8
Interventions for Indigenous Peoples making health decisions: a systematic review.针对原住民健康决策的干预措施：一项系统综述。
Arch Public Health. 2023 Sep 27;81(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01177-1.
COVID-19 证据合成信息疫情的前 5 个月的特征、质量和数量：一项元研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2022 Jun;27(3):169-177. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111710. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
4
A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study.在两周内使用自动化工具完成了全面的系统回顾：案例研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 May;121:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
5
Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems.厘清证据生态系统内各综述间的差异。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 15;8(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1089-2.
6
Developing and testing intervention theory by incorporating a views synthesis into a qualitative comparative analysis of intervention effectiveness.通过将观点综合纳入干预效果的定性比较分析来开发和测试干预理论。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Sep;10(3):389-397. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1341. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
7
Usage of automation tools in systematic reviews.自动化工具在系统评价中的使用。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Mar;10(1):72-82. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1335. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
8
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估：简介系列。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0688-3.
9
Prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia.用于严重肢体缺血的前列腺素类药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 10;1(1):CD006544. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006544.pub3.
10
What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences.我应该进行什么样的系统评价？医学和健康科学系统评价者的建议分类法和指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4.