Suppr超能文献

卫生专业辅助人员中的疫苗犹豫:一项混合方法研究。

Vaccine hesitancy among health paraprofessionals: A mixed methods study.

作者信息

Hergott Madeline, Andreski Michael, Rovers John

机构信息

College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0312708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312708. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines vaccine hesitancy as "a delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite availability of vaccination services". Vaccine hesitancy has also been declared a top threat to global health. Some employers imposed vaccine mandates during the Covid-19 pandemic resulting in health care employees resigning or being fired rather than receive a vaccine. Healthcare paraprofessionals such as certified nursing assistants, dietary and home health aides are among the most patient facing of all health care providers. Their beliefs and attitudes about vaccines are critical to how they communicate about vaccines with their patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this project was to survey health care paraprofessionals to explore their thoughts and opinions about vaccines in general, and Covid-19 vaccines specifically.

METHODS

This was a 25 question, mixed methods, cross sectional email survey. Subjects were recruited from the mailing list of a non-profit organization in the Midwest. This organization is dedicated to bringing a face and a voice to healthcare paraprofessionals engaged in direct patient care.

RESULTS

Most respondents were reasonably well informed about vaccines; had received one or more doses of indicated vaccines; used credible resources to learn about vaccines and believed physicians and pharmacists were the most trusted information sources. Qualitative results indicated that respondents expressed support for vaccines but that the support was often qualified in that a respondent may have had both pro and anti-vaccine opinions in the same response. They also expressed that communications about vaccines were often problematic. Additional vaccine-related continuing professional development for healthcare paraprofessionals appears to be indicated.

CONCLUSIONS

Although attitudes towards vaccines were generally positive, respondents had concerns about the quality of vaccine information. Additional vaccine-related continuing professional development for healthcare paraprofessionals appears to be indicated.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)将疫苗犹豫定义为“尽管有疫苗接种服务,但仍延迟接受或拒绝接种疫苗”。疫苗犹豫也被宣布为对全球健康的最大威胁之一。在新冠疫情期间,一些雇主强制要求接种疫苗,导致医护人员辞职或被解雇,而不是接种疫苗。医疗辅助人员,如注册护理助理、饮食和家庭健康助理,是所有医疗服务提供者中与患者接触最多的群体。他们对疫苗的信念和态度对于他们与患者就疫苗进行沟通的方式至关重要。

目的

本项目的目的是对医疗辅助人员进行调查,以探讨他们对一般疫苗,特别是新冠疫苗的想法和意见。

方法

这是一项包含25个问题的混合方法横断面电子邮件调查。研究对象从美国中西部一个非营利组织的邮件列表中招募。该组织致力于为从事直接患者护理的医疗辅助人员发声。

结果

大多数受访者对疫苗有一定了解;已接种一剂或多剂指定疫苗;通过可靠来源了解疫苗,并认为医生和药剂师是最值得信赖的信息来源。定性结果表明,受访者表示支持疫苗,但这种支持往往有保留,因为受访者可能在同一回答中既有支持疫苗的观点,也有反对疫苗的观点。他们还表示,关于疫苗的沟通往往存在问题。似乎需要为医疗辅助人员提供更多与疫苗相关的持续专业发展。

结论

尽管对疫苗的态度总体上是积极的,但受访者对疫苗信息的质量表示担忧。似乎需要为医疗辅助人员提供更多与疫苗相关的持续专业发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1b/11706496/11148d7f9ee1/pone.0312708.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验