Parisi Andrea, Regazzi Luca, Spanaus Emma Sophie, Valz Gris Angelica, Cadeddu Chiara, Moore Michael, Ricciardi Walter, Lomazzi Marta
ACT Health, Canberra, Australia; World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA), Geneva, Switzerland.
Section of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Public Health. 2025 Jan;238:188-196. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.016. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
Healthcare workers (HCWs) are a trusted source of vaccine-related information for patients and communities, but they can show hesitancy or reluctance towards vaccinations. The objective of our study was to investigate HCWs' sentiment and hesitancy towards vaccination, focusing on COVID-19 and influenza vaccination.
A global cross-sectional study spanning four continents.
Utilizing a web-based survey, we gathered responses from 7793 HCWs across twelve countries. We used Latent Class Analysis models to build response profiles for respondents. We employed multilevel multivariable logistic regression models to assess the impact of individual determinants and country contextual effects on change in vaccine sentiment (ChVS) and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (CoVH).
HCWs exhibited high agreement on the safety, effectiveness, and usefulness of vaccines. However, 21% reported strong or moderate CoVH. Country contextual effects significantly influenced ChVS and CoVH, with variations observed across nations, accounting for 6% of global variance in both ChVS and CoVH. Individual factors such as educational level, fear of contracting COVID-19, knowledge of COVID 19 vaccines, CoVH, influenza vaccination behaviour and general confidence in vaccines significantly influenced ChVS. CoVH was related to profession, influenza vaccination behaviour, fear of COVID-19 and main information sources.
Individual factors played a major role in determining change in vaccine sentiment and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, but they can be modulated by other contextual elements at the country level. There is a need for tailored, nation-specific strategies to address vaccine hesitancy and enhance vaccine confidence among HCWs.
医护人员是患者和社区获取疫苗相关信息的可靠来源,但他们可能对疫苗接种表现出犹豫或不情愿。我们研究的目的是调查医护人员对疫苗接种的态度和犹豫程度,重点关注新冠病毒疫苗和流感疫苗接种。
一项横跨四大洲的全球横断面研究。
我们通过一项基于网络的调查,收集了来自12个国家的7793名医护人员的回复。我们使用潜在类别分析模型为受访者建立回答概况。我们采用多水平多变量逻辑回归模型来评估个体决定因素和国家背景因素对疫苗态度变化(ChVS)和新冠病毒疫苗犹豫(CoVH)的影响。
医护人员对疫苗的安全性、有效性和有用性表现出高度认同。然而,21%的人报告有强烈或中度的新冠病毒疫苗犹豫。国家背景因素对ChVS和CoVH有显著影响,各国之间存在差异,在ChVS和CoVH中分别占全球方差的6%。教育水平、感染新冠病毒的恐惧、对新冠病毒疫苗的了解、CoVH、流感疫苗接种行为以及对疫苗的总体信心等个体因素对ChVS有显著影响。CoVH与职业、流感疫苗接种行为、对新冠病毒的恐惧以及主要信息来源有关。
个体因素在决定疫苗态度变化和新冠病毒疫苗犹豫方面起主要作用,但它们可受到国家层面其他背景因素的调节。需要制定针对特定国家的策略,以解决疫苗犹豫问题并增强医护人员对疫苗的信心。