Rand Debbie, Omer Nitsan, Levkoviz Amihai, Assadi Khalil Samar
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Benai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0316356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316356. eCollection 2025.
To efficiently perform bimanual daily tasks, bimanual coordination is needed. Bimanual coordination is the interaction between an individual's hands, which may be impaired post-stroke, however clinical and functional assessments are lacking and research is limited.
To develop a valid and reliable observation tool to assess bimanual coordination of individuals post-stroke.
A cross-sectional study.
Rehabilitation settings.
Occupational therapists (OTs) with stroke rehabilitation experience and individuals post stroke.
The development and content validity of BOTH included a literature review, review of existing tools and followed a 10-step process. The conceptual and operational definitions of bimanual coordination were defined as well as scoring criteria. Then multiple rounds of feedback from expert OTs were performed. OTs reviewed BOTH using the 'Template for assessing content validity through expert judgement' questionnaire. Then, BOTH was administered to 51 participants post-stroke. Cronbach's alpha was used to verify internal reliability of BOTH and construct validity of BOTH was assessed by correlating it to the bimanual subtests of The Purdue Pegboard Test.
Expert validity was established in two-rounds with 11 OTs. Cronbach's alpha was α = 0.923 for the asymmetrical items, 0.897 for the symmetrical items and 0.949 for all eight items. The item-total correlations of BOTH were also strong and significant. The total score of BOTH was strongly significantly correlated with The Purdue-Both hands placement (r = .787, p < .001) and Assembly (r = .730, p < .001) subtests.
BOTH is a new observation tool to assess bimanual coordination post-stroke. Expert validity of BOTH was established, excellent internal reliability and construct validity were demonstrated. Further research is needed, so in the future, BOTH can be used for clinical and research purposes to address bimanual coordination post-stroke.
为了高效地执行双手日常任务,需要双手协调性。双手协调性是个体双手之间的相互作用,中风后可能会受损,然而目前缺乏临床和功能评估,相关研究也很有限。
开发一种有效且可靠的观察工具,以评估中风后个体的双手协调性。
横断面研究。
康复机构。
有中风康复经验的职业治疗师(OT)和中风后个体。
《双侧手部协调性测试》(BOTH)的开发和内容效度包括文献综述、对现有工具的审查,并遵循了一个10步骤的过程。定义了双手协调性的概念和操作定义以及评分标准。然后进行了多轮来自专家OT的反馈。OT使用“通过专家判断评估内容效度的模板”问卷对BOTH进行审查。然后,对51名中风后参与者实施BOTH。使用Cronbach's α系数来验证BOTH的内部信度,并通过将其与普渡钉板测试的双手子测试相关联来评估BOTH的结构效度。
通过两轮与11名OT建立了专家效度。BOTH的不对称项目的Cronbach's α系数为α = 0.923,对称项目为0.897,所有八个项目为0.949。BOTH的项目总分相关性也很强且具有显著性。BOTH的总分与普渡双手放置(r = 0.787,p < 0.001)和组装(r = 0.730,p < 0.001)子测试高度显著相关。
BOTH是一种评估中风后双手协调性的新观察工具。已建立BOTH的专家效度,证明了其出色的内部信度和结构效度。需要进一步研究,以便未来BOTH可用于临床和研究目的,以解决中风后的双手协调性问题。