• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

申办者管理数据监测委员会的最佳实践与操作原则

A Sponsor's Best Practice and Operating Principles to Manage Data Monitoring Committees.

作者信息

Birck Malene Muusfeldt, Rasmussen Josephine Skovgaard, Helmark Ida Carøe, Lollike Karsten

机构信息

Safety Surveillance, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Medical & Science, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Mar;59(2):215-221. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00742-w. Epub 2025 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-025-00742-w
PMID:39775411
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11880147/
Abstract

The use of data monitoring committees (DMC) to safeguard patients' safety in clinical trials has evolved over the last decades and has become increasingly common. To ensure well-operating and high-performing DMCs, pharmaceutical companies need to establish clearly defined operational processes while continuously seeking to optimize these and adapt to the needs of drug development. Although there are health authority guidelines on establishing and managing a DMC, the perspectives and experiences of sponsors are often underrepresented. This publication shares insights on a sponsor, Novo Nordisk (NN), regarding principles and practices for DMC establishment and management across varying trial types and therapeutic areas, including challenges and solutions. Highlighting NN's structured and successful approach to DMCs, it details clearly defined roles and responsibilities that ensure productive DMC meetings and high-quality data for the DMC. Additionally, NN's practices for clear, transparent, and trustful communication between the sponsor, the DMC, and the independent external statistical vendor are described. Processes for quality control, internal audits, and learnings from inspections and how these are incorporated for continuous improvement of the DMC process are discussed. While the processes and practices described are primarily designed for medium and large pharmaceutical companies, certain aspects may also be relevant and beneficial for smaller companies.

摘要

在过去几十年里,利用数据监测委员会(DMC)保障临床试验中患者安全的做法不断发展,且日益普遍。为确保DMC高效运作,制药公司需要建立明确的操作流程,同时不断寻求优化这些流程并适应药物研发需求。尽管卫生当局有关于设立和管理DMC的指南,但申办方的观点和经验往往未得到充分体现。本出版物分享了申办方诺和诺德(NN)在不同试验类型和治疗领域设立和管理DMC的原则及实践的见解,包括挑战与解决方案。重点介绍了NN对DMC采用的结构化且成功的方法,详细说明了明确界定的角色和职责,以确保DMC会议富有成效且为其提供高质量数据。此外,还描述了NN在申办方、DMC和独立外部统计供应商之间进行清晰、透明和互信沟通的做法。讨论了质量控制、内部审计流程以及从检查中吸取的经验教训,以及如何将这些纳入以持续改进DMC流程。虽然所描述的流程和实践主要是为大中型制药公司设计的,但某些方面对小型公司也可能具有相关性和益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8396/11880147/4e08c5ffa6fa/43441_2025_742_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8396/11880147/7bfb6a242da5/43441_2025_742_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8396/11880147/4e08c5ffa6fa/43441_2025_742_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8396/11880147/7bfb6a242da5/43441_2025_742_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8396/11880147/4e08c5ffa6fa/43441_2025_742_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Sponsor's Best Practice and Operating Principles to Manage Data Monitoring Committees.申办者管理数据监测委员会的最佳实践与操作原则
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Mar;59(2):215-221. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00742-w. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
2
Issues in data monitoring and interim analysis of trials.试验数据监测与中期分析中的问题。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(7):1-238, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9070.
3
Enhancing trial integrity by protecting the independence of data monitoring committees in clinical trials.通过保护临床试验数据监测委员会的独立性来提高试验的完整性。
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(5):968-75. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.925719.
4
The changing landscape of data monitoring committees-Perspectives from regulators, members, and sponsors.数据监测委员会不断变化的格局——监管机构、成员及申办方的观点
Biom J. 2019 Sep;61(5):1232-1241. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700307. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
5
A joint industry-sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real-world setting.真实世界环境下观察性、回顾性药物安全性研究的联合行业赞助数据监测委员会模型。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Jan;30(1):9-16. doi: 10.1002/pds.5172. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
6
On the independence of data monitoring committee in adaptive design clinical trials.论适应性设计临床试验中数据监测委员会的独立性
J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(4):853-67. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2012.676536.
7
Issues in regulatory guidelines for data monitoring committees.数据监测委员会监管指南中的问题。
Clin Trials. 2004;1(2):162-9. doi: 10.1191/1740774504cn019xx.
8
Recommendations for data monitoring committees from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.临床试验转化倡议组织对数据监测委员会的建议。
Clin Trials. 2017 Aug;14(4):342-348. doi: 10.1177/1740774517707743. Epub 2017 May 13.
9
"You have to keep your nerve on a DMC." Challenges for Data Monitoring Committees in neonatal intensive care trials: Qualitative accounts from the BRACELET Study.“在 DMC 中,你必须保持冷静。”新生儿重症监护试验中数据监测委员会面临的挑战:BRACELET 研究的定性描述。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 26;13(7):e0201037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201037. eCollection 2018.
10
Data Monitoring Committee Reports: Telling the Data's Story.数据监测委员会报告:讲述数据背后的故事。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Mar;59(2):222-233. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00727-1. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes.司美格鲁肽在肥胖但无糖尿病患者中的心血管结局。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Dec 14;389(24):2221-2232. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307563. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
2
Phase 3 Trial of Concizumab in Hemophilia with Inhibitors.康西珠单抗治疗伴有抑制剂的血友病的 3 期临床试验。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 31;389(9):783-794. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2216455.
3
Bringing data monitoring committee charters into the sunlight.将数据监测委员会章程置于阳光下。
Clin Trials. 2023 Aug;20(4):447-451. doi: 10.1177/17407745231169499. Epub 2023 May 25.
4
Effects of oral semaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and/or chronic kidney disease: Design and baseline characteristics of SOUL, a randomized trial.口服司美格鲁肽对 2 型糖尿病合并已确诊的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病和/或慢性肾脏病患者心血管结局的影响:一项随机试验 SOUL 的设计和基线特征。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Jul;25(7):1932-1941. doi: 10.1111/dom.15058. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
5
The rationale, design and baseline data of FLOW, a kidney outcomes trial with once-weekly semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.在伴有慢性肾脏疾病的 2 型糖尿病患者中,每周一次司美格鲁肽治疗的肾脏结局试验(FLOW)的原理、设计和基线数据。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 Aug 31;38(9):2041-2051. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfad009.
6
Long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors.皮下康西珠单抗预防治疗对血友病 A 和有抑制剂的血友病 A/B 的长期疗效和安全性。
Blood Adv. 2022 Jun 14;6(11):3422-3432. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006403.
7
Importance and role of independent data monitoring committees (IDMCs) in oncology clinical trials.重要性和独立数据监测委员会(IDMCs)在肿瘤临床试验中的作用。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 25;11(10):e047294. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047294.
8
Data monitoring committee interim reports: We must get there soon!数据监测委员会中期报告:我们必须尽快达成目标!
Clin Trials. 2022 Feb;19(1):107-111. doi: 10.1177/17407745211051279. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
9
Subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors: phase 2 trial results.皮下康西珠单抗预防治疗 A 型血友病和有抑制剂的 A/B 型血友病:2 期临床试验结果。
Blood. 2019 Nov 28;134(22):1973-1982. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001542.
10
The changing landscape of data monitoring committees-Perspectives from regulators, members, and sponsors.数据监测委员会不断变化的格局——监管机构、成员及申办方的观点
Biom J. 2019 Sep;61(5):1232-1241. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700307. Epub 2018 Dec 27.