Malthiery Clément, Hossu Gabriela, Ayav Ahmet, Laurent Valérie
Department of Adult Radiology, CHRU de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Clinical Investigation Center Technological Innovation of Nancy, Inserm, CHRU de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan 8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11314-1.
This study compared the characteristics of lesions suspicious for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and their LI-RADS classifications in adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) to those of MR images, along with radiologist confidence.
This prospective single-center trial included patients who underwent four-phase liver CT and multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI within 7 days from February to August 2023. The lesion characteristics, LI-RADS classifications and confidence scores according to two radiologists on the ASIR, DLR and MRI techniques were compared. If the patient had at least one lesion, he was included in the HCC group, otherwise in the non-HCC group. MRI being the technique with the best sensitivity, concordance of lesions characteristics and LI-RADS classifications were calculated by weighted kappa between the ASIR and MRI and between the DLR and MRI. The confidence scores are expressed as the means and standard deviations.
Eighty-nine patients were enrolled, 52 in the HCC group (67 years ± 9 [mean ± SD], 46 men) and 37 in the non-HCC group (68 years ± 9, 33 men). The concordance coefficient between the LI-RADS classification by ASIR and MRI was 0.64 [0.52; 0.76], showing good agreement, that by DLR and MRI was 0.83 [0.73; 0.92], showing excellent agreement. The diagnostic confidence in ASIR was 3.31 ± 0.95 (mean ± SD) and 3.0 ± 1.11, that in the DLR was 3.9 ± 0.88 and 4.11 ± 0.75, that in the MRI was 4.46 ± 0.80 and 4.57 ± 0.80.
DLR provided excellent LI-RADS classification concordance with MRI, whereas ASIR provided good concordance. The radiologists' confidence was greater in the DLR than in the ASIR but remained highest in the MR group.
Question Does the use of deep learning reconstructions (DLR) improve LI-RADS classification of suspicious hepatocellular carcinoma lesions compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstructions (ASIR)? Findings DLR demonstrated superior concordance of LI-RADS classification with MRI compared to ASIR. It also provided greater diagnostic confidence than ASIR. Clinical relevance The use of DLR enhances radiologists' ability to visualize and characterize lesions suspected of being HCC, as well as their LI-RADS classification. Moreover, it also boosts their confidence in interpreting these images.
本研究比较了自适应统计迭代重建(ASIR)和深度学习重建(DLR)中疑似肝细胞癌(HCC)病变的特征及其LI-RADS分类与磁共振成像(MRI)的特征,以及放射科医生的信心。
这项前瞻性单中心试验纳入了2023年2月至8月7天内接受四期肝脏CT和多期对比增强MRI检查的患者。比较了两位放射科医生根据ASIR、DLR和MRI技术得出的病变特征、LI-RADS分类和信心评分。如果患者至少有一个病变,则将其纳入HCC组,否则纳入非HCC组。由于MRI是敏感性最佳的技术,通过计算ASIR与MRI之间以及DLR与MRI之间的加权kappa值,得出病变特征和LI-RADS分类的一致性。信心评分以平均值和标准差表示。
共纳入89例患者,HCC组52例(67岁±9岁[平均±标准差],46例男性),非HCC组37例(68岁±9岁,33例男性)。ASIR与MRI的LI-RADS分类一致性系数为0.64[0.52;0.76],显示出良好的一致性;DLR与MRI的一致性系数为0.83[0.73;0.92],显示出极佳的一致性。ASIR的诊断信心为3.31±0.95(平均±标准差)和3.0±1.11,DLR的诊断信心为3.9±0.88和4.11±0.75,MRI的诊断信心为4.46±0.80和4.57±0.80。
DLR与MRI的LI-RADS分类一致性极佳,而ASIR与MRI的一致性良好。放射科医生对DLR的信心高于ASIR,但在MRI组中信心仍然最高。
问题 与自适应统计迭代重建(ASIR)相比,深度学习重建(DLR)的使用是否能改善疑似肝细胞癌病变的LI-RADS分类?研究结果 DLR与MRI的LI-RADS分类一致性优于ASIR。它还比ASIR提供了更高的诊断信心。临床意义 DLR的使用增强了放射科医生对疑似HCC病变进行可视化和特征描述的能力,以及他们对LI-RADS分类的能力。此外,它还增强了他们解读这些图像的信心。