Chase Dana M, Hanna Maya, Lim Jonathan T, Boyle Tirza Areli Calderón, Guinter Mark, Richey Madeline, Patel Khilna, Schilder Jeanne M, Hurteau Jean A, Golembesky Amanda K
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 855 Tiverton Dr, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
GSK, Upper Providence, PA, USA.
Oncol Ther. 2025 Mar;13(1):253-262. doi: 10.1007/s40487-024-00318-y. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
Niraparib was approved for first-line (1L) maintenance (1LM) treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) following the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (PRIMA) trial. PRIMA was restricted to patients at higher risk of progression (excluded stage III EOC with no visible residual disease [NVRD] after primary cytoreductive surgery [PCS]). This retrospective study evaluated the potential impact of excluding stage III EOC with NVRD from PRIMA by assessing real-world treatment outcomes following 1LM niraparib monotherapy in this patient population.
Data from a US-nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database comprised adult patients diagnosed with stage III/IV EOC who received 1L platinum-based chemotherapy and initiated niraparib 1LM monotherapy (01Jan2017-28Feb2023). Patients were classified as PRIMA-like (EOC with higher-risk prognostic factors for disease progression) or stage III disease with NVRD after PCS. Real-world time to next treatment (rwTTNT) and progression-free survival (rwPFS), assessed from the end date of 1L platinum-based chemotherapy, were measured via Kaplan-Meier methods.
Among 453 patients who received niraparib 1LM (PRIMA-like cohort, n = 390; stage III NVRD cohort, n = 63), median follow-up from index was 14.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 7.3-25.1) and 18.4 (IQR, 9.3-29.1) months in the PRIMA-like and stage III NVRD cohorts, respectively. Median rwTTNT was significantly longer in the stage III NVRD cohort (22.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.3-not reached] months) than in the PRIMA-like cohort (11.7 [95% CI, 10.8-12.9] months; P < 0.001). Median rwPFS in the stage III NVRD cohort (25.2 [95% CI, 12.6-not reached] months) was more than double that in the PRIMA-like cohort (10.1 [95% CI, 9.1-11.9] months; P < 0.001).
In the stage III NVRD cohort, rwTTNT and rwPFS were significantly longer than in the PRIMA-like cohort, consistent with clinical expectation. Results suggest niraparib clinical benefit may have been underestimated in PRIMA because of the exclusion of patients with stage III EOC with NVRD after PCS.
在PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012(PRIMA)试验之后,尼拉帕尼被批准用于晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者的一线(1L)维持(1LM)治疗。PRIMA试验仅限于疾病进展风险较高的患者(排除初次肿瘤细胞减灭术[PCS]后无可见残留病灶[NVRD]的III期EOC患者)。这项回顾性研究通过评估该患者群体接受1LM尼拉帕尼单药治疗后的真实世界治疗结局,来评估将PCS后无NVRD的III期EOC患者排除在PRIMA试验之外的潜在影响。
来自美国全国性电子健康记录衍生的去识别数据库的数据,包括诊断为III/IV期EOC且接受1L铂类化疗并开始1LM尼拉帕尼单药治疗的成年患者(2017年1月1日至2023年2月28日)。患者被分类为PRIMA样患者(具有疾病进展高风险预后因素的EOC)或PCS后有NVRD的III期疾病患者。从1L铂类化疗结束日期开始评估的真实世界下次治疗时间(rwTTNT)和无进展生存期(rwPFS),通过Kaplan-Meier方法进行测量。
在接受1LM尼拉帕尼治疗的453例患者中(PRIMA样队列,n = 390;III期NVRD队列,n = 63),PRIMA样队列和III期NVRD队列从索引开始的中位随访时间分别为14.9(四分位间距[IQR],7.3 - 25.1)个月和18.4(IQR,9.3 - 29.1)个月。III期NVRD队列的中位rwTTNT(22.5 [95%置信区间(CI),17.3 - 未达到]个月)显著长于PRIMA样队列(11.7 [95% CI,10.8 - 12.9]个月;P < 0.001)。III期NVRD队列的中位rwPFS(25.2 [95% CI,12.6 - 未达到]个月)是PRIMA样队列(10.1 [95% CI,9.1 - 11.9]个月;P < 0.001)的两倍多。
在III期NVRD队列中,rwTTNT和rwPFS显著长于PRIMA样队列,与临床预期一致。结果表明,由于排除了PCS后有NVRD的III期EOC患者,PRIMA试验中尼拉帕尼的临床获益可能被低估了。