Stanco Deborah, Lipsa Dorelia, Bogni Alessia, Bremer-Hoffmann Susanne, Clerbaux Laure-Alix
European Commission, Joint Research Center (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Independent Researcher, Ispra, Italy.
Front Toxicol. 2024 Dec 24;6:1474397. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1474397. eCollection 2024.
The ingestion of nanomaterials (NMs) may impair the intestinal barrier, but the underlying mechanisms remain evasive, and evidence has not been systematically gathered or produced. A mechanistic-based approach would be instrumental in assessing whether relevant NMs disrupt the intestinal barrier, thereby supporting the NM risk assessment in the food sector.
In this study, we developed an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) based on biological plausibility and by leveraging information from an existing NM-relevant AOP that leads to hepatic outcomes. We then extracted the current evidence from the literature for a targeted selection of NMs with high relevance to the food sector, namely, ZnO, CuO, FeO, SiO, and Ag NMs and nanocellulose.
We propose a new AOP (AOP 530) that starts with endocytic lysosomal uptake, leading to lysosomal disruption inducing mitochondrial dysfunction. Mitochondrial impairments can lead to cell injury/death and disrupt the intestinal barrier. The evidence collected supports that these food-related NMs can be taken up by intestinal cells and indicates that intestinal barrier disruption may occur due to Ag, CuO, and SiO NMs, while only few studies support this outcome for FeO and ZnO. Lysosomal disruption and mitochondrial dysfunction are rarely evaluated. For nanocellulose, none of the studies report toxicity-related events.
The collection of existing scientific evidence supporting our AOP linking NM uptake to intestinal barrier impairments allowed us to highlight current evidence gaps and data inconsistencies. These inconsistencies could be associated with the variety of stressors, biological systems, and key event (KE)-related assays used in different studies. This underscores the need for further harmonized methodologies and the production of mechanistic evidence for the safety regulatory assessment of NMs in the food sector.
纳米材料(NMs)的摄入可能会损害肠道屏障,但其潜在机制仍不明确,且尚未系统地收集或提供相关证据。基于机制的方法将有助于评估相关纳米材料是否会破坏肠道屏障,从而支持食品领域的纳米材料风险评估。
在本研究中,我们基于生物学合理性并利用现有与纳米材料相关的不良结局途径(AOP)中导致肝脏结局的信息,开发了一条不良结局途径。然后,我们从文献中提取当前证据,以针对性地选择与食品领域高度相关的纳米材料,即氧化锌(ZnO)、氧化铜(CuO)、氧化亚铁(FeO)、二氧化硅(SiO)、银纳米材料(Ag NMs)和纳米纤维素。
我们提出了一条新的不良结局途径(AOP 530),该途径始于内吞溶酶体摄取,导致溶酶体破坏,进而诱导线粒体功能障碍。线粒体损伤可导致细胞损伤/死亡,并破坏肠道屏障。收集到的证据支持这些与食品相关的纳米材料可被肠道细胞摄取,并表明银、氧化铜和二氧化硅纳米材料可能会导致肠道屏障破坏,而仅有少数研究支持氧化亚铁和氧化锌会出现这一结果。很少有研究评估溶酶体破坏和线粒体功能障碍。对于纳米纤维素,没有研究报告与毒性相关的事件。
收集到的支持我们将纳米材料摄取与肠道屏障损伤联系起来的不良结局途径的现有科学证据,使我们能够突出当前的证据空白和数据不一致之处。这些不一致可能与不同研究中使用的各种应激源、生物系统和关键事件(KE)相关检测方法有关。这强调了需要进一步统一方法,并为食品领域纳米材料的安全监管评估提供机制证据。