Suppr超能文献

罗哌卡因联合纳布啡在竖脊肌平面阻滞用于腰椎创伤手术术后镇痛的效果:一项单中心随机对照试验

Effect of Ropivacaine Combined with Nalbuphine in Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Trauma Surgery: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Zhang Jin, Zhang Fan, Zhang Hao, Yu Lei, Chen Jun, Wang Shaolin

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, the Second People's Hospital of Wuhu, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2025 Jan 3;18:11-19. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S493518. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been increasingly utilized for postoperative analgesia in thoracic, abdominal, and spinal surgeries. This study evaluated the postoperative analgesic outcomes of ESPB with nalbuphine as a ropivacaine adjuvant for lumbar trauma surgery.

METHODS

This randomized double-blind clinical trial included 57 participants who underwent lumbar trauma surgery. Ultrasound-guided ESPB was performed with 0.375% ropivacaine (Group R) and 0.375% ropivacaine combined with 10 mg nalbuphine (Group N); 20 mL was used per side. The primary outcome measure was the time to first postoperative remedial analgesia. The secondary outcome measures included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at rest and during movement, cumulative sufentanil consumption after surgery, intraoperative dosage of remifentanil and sufentanil, time to first off-bed, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The mean difference in the time to first postoperative remedial analgesia (Group N vs Group R, 489±52 min vs 391±23 min) was 98 min (95% CI, 76 to 119). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed an increasing pain-free population in Group N and an increasing pain-free duration. The log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test showed that the hazard ratio (HR, Group N/Group R) was 0.225 (95% CI, 0.114 to 0.443). Group N showed decreased sufentanil consumption compared with Group R at 4-8 h, 8-12 h and 0-24 h after surgery (<0.001).

CONCLUSION

ESPB with nalbuphine in combination with ropivacaine significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia and reduced postoperative analgesic demands compared to ropivacaine alone.

摘要

背景

竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)已越来越多地用于胸科、腹部和脊柱手术的术后镇痛。本研究评估了以纳布啡作为罗哌卡因辅助药物用于腰椎创伤手术的ESPB术后镇痛效果。

方法

这项随机双盲临床试验纳入了57例行腰椎创伤手术的参与者。采用超声引导下ESPB,分别给予0.375%罗哌卡因(R组)和0.375%罗哌卡因联合10 mg纳布啡(N组);每侧使用20 mL。主要结局指标为术后首次补救性镇痛的时间。次要结局指标包括静息和活动时的数字评定量表(NRS)评分、术后舒芬太尼累计用量、术中瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼用量、首次离床时间、首次排气时间和住院时间。

结果

术后首次补救性镇痛时间的平均差异(N组与R组,489±52分钟 vs 391±23分钟)为98分钟(95%CI,76至119)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示N组无痛人群增加,无痛持续时间延长。对数秩(Mantel-Cox)检验显示风险比(HR,N组/R组)为0.225(95%CI,0.114至0.443)。术后4 - 8小时、8 - 12小时和0 - 24小时,N组舒芬太尼用量较R组减少(<0.001)。

结论

与单独使用罗哌卡因相比,纳布啡联合罗哌卡因的ESPB显著延长了镇痛时间,减少了术后镇痛需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae7/11706020/c437a3a0e20f/JPR-18-11-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验