Armitage Richard C
Academic Unit of Population and Lifespan Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14300. doi: 10.1111/jep.14300.
An increasing number of UK residents are travelling overseas to access medical treatments, the negative health consequences of which are largely managed by NHS doctors.
This paper performs an ethical analysis, using the ethical framework of principlism, of the duties of NHS doctors in managing these negative health consequences of medical tourism overseas.
While the doctor's duty to respect patient autonomy contains a negative duty to not interfere with their choice to access medical treatment overseas, it also contains a positive duty to ensure this choice is informed. This requires those considering medical tourism overseas to be counselled on the risks. This should take place directly by counselling, and indirectly through public health messaging. Beneficence requires the doctor to promote the patient's health, therefore obligating them to treat complications of medical tourism overseas, to intervene if poor cosmetic outcomes negatively impact the patient's mental health, and to refer the patient if the necessary aftercare is insufficiently or entirely unavailable on the NHS. Beneficence also requires doctors to remove harm, meaning they must counsel patients about the risks of medical tourism overseas to minimise the risk of negative health consequences. Justice requires NHS doctors to care for patients according to their clinical needs regardless of how that need has arisen, including the negative health consequences of medical tourism abroad, and requires NHS doctors to minimise these negative health consequences to minimise the scarce resources allocated to addressing them. The duty of non-maleficence is not relevant in this context.
Amongst other requirements, this paper finds that NHS doctors must counsel those considering medical tourism overseas on the risks of doing so, and existing efforts to do so should be increased to reflect the increasing prevalence of medical tourism overseas by UK residents and the associated negative health consequences.
越来越多的英国居民前往海外寻求医疗服务,而这些医疗服务对健康产生的负面后果主要由英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的医生来处理。
本文运用原则主义的伦理框架,对NHS医生处理海外医疗旅游带来的这些负面健康后果的职责进行伦理分析。
虽然医生尊重患者自主权的职责包含一项消极义务,即不干涉患者选择海外就医,但也包含一项积极义务,即确保这种选择是在充分知情的情况下做出的。这就要求向那些考虑海外医疗旅游的人提供有关风险的咨询。这既可以通过直接咨询来实现,也可以通过公共卫生信息间接实现。行善原则要求医生促进患者的健康,因此要求他们治疗海外医疗旅游的并发症,在美容效果不佳对患者心理健康产生负面影响时进行干预,以及在NHS无法提供足够或完全无法提供必要的后续护理时为患者提供转诊。行善原则还要求医生消除伤害,这意味着他们必须向患者咨询海外医疗旅游的风险,以尽量减少负面健康后果的风险。公正原则要求NHS医生根据患者的临床需求提供护理,无论这种需求是如何产生的,包括海外医疗旅游的负面健康后果,并要求NHS医生尽量减少这些负面健康后果,以尽量减少用于解决这些问题的稀缺资源。在这种情况下,不伤害原则不相关。
除其他要求外,本文发现NHS医生必须向那些考虑海外医疗旅游的人提供有关这样做的风险的咨询,并且应该加大现有的相关努力,以反映英国居民海外医疗旅游日益普遍的情况以及相关的负面健康后果。