Tisdale Rebecca L, Cao Fang, Skye Megan, Vardeny Orly, Sallam Karim, Kalwani Neil, Hsaio Stephanie, Varshney Anubodh S, Heidenreich Paul A, Sandhu Alexander T
Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California; Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
J Card Fail. 2025 Jan 6. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.12.006.
Guidelines recommend timely follow-up with a cardiology specialist for patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF), but it is unknown whether the timeliness of specialty cardiovascular care after discharge correlates with clinical risk. We south to assess the association between estimated mortality risk and post-HF hospitalization cardiology follow-up.
In a cohort of veterans hospitalized with HF in acute care Veterans Health Administration (VA) hospitals between January 1, 2018, and September 15, 2022, we estimated the association of mortality risk at discharge with postdischarge cardiology encounters via logistic regression. We also evaluated the association between cardiology visits and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and described variability in postdischarge follow-up rates across VA facilities. We identified a cohort of 84,348 veterans hospitalized with HF with 120,619 hospital admissions. Of a subcohort of 57,554 veterans with 79,866 hospitalizations surviving at least 1 year after discharge, 32.1% of hospitalizations were followed by a cardiology visit within 2 weeks, and 49.3% within 1 month. Marginal probabilities of 2-week and 1-month follow-up were higher for hospitalizations in the highest-risk quintile than those in the lowest-risk quintile (34% vs. 30% and 51% vs. 47%, respectively; P < 0.001 for both intervals). In a time-to-event model in the full cohort, there was a slightly negative association between risk and likelihood of 1-month follow-up (coefficient for MAGGIC score = -0.004, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.005 to -0.003). Black veterans were less likely to have either 2-week or 1-month follow-up (adjusted odds ratios, 0.93 [95% CI 0.90-0.97] for 2 weeks and 0.93 [95% CI 0.89-0.96] for 1 month). Female veterans were also less likely to have follow-up within 1 month of hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio 0.90 [95% CI 0.90-0.98]). Conversely, patients with a primary vs secondary hospital diagnosis of HF and those with reduced vs preserved ejection fraction were more likely to have 2-week follow-up (adjusted odds ratios 1.67 [95% CI 1.62-1.73] and 1.72 [95% CI 1.67-1.78], respectively) and 1-month follow-up (adjusted odds ratios 1.83 [95% CI 1.78-1.88] and 1.85 [95% CI 1.80-1.90], respectively). The 1-month follow-up rates varied from 5% to 69% across VA facilities.
The rate of visits with a cardiologist within 2 weeks or 1 month after HF hospitalization was low overall, was at most modestly associated with estimated mortality risk at discharge, and varied by sex, race/ethnicity, and across VA facilities. Increasing the visit rate after HF hospitalization should be evaluated as a mechanism to improve outcomes after HF hospitalizations, particularly for higher-risk individuals.
指南建议对因心力衰竭(HF)住院的患者及时安排心脏病专家进行随访,但出院后专科心血管护理的及时性是否与临床风险相关尚不清楚。我们旨在评估估计的死亡风险与心力衰竭住院后心脏病学随访之间的关联。
在2018年1月1日至2022年9月15日期间在退伍军人健康管理局(VA)急性护理医院因心力衰竭住院的退伍军人队列中,我们通过逻辑回归估计出院时的死亡风险与出院后心脏病学诊疗之间的关联。我们还评估了心脏病学就诊与社会人口统计学和临床特征之间的关联,并描述了VA各机构出院后随访率的差异。我们确定了一个由84348名因心力衰竭住院的退伍军人组成的队列,共有120619次住院记录。在一个由57554名退伍军人组成的亚队列中,他们有79866次住院记录,出院后至少存活1年,其中32.1%的住院患者在出院后2周内接受了心脏病学就诊,49.3%在1个月内接受了就诊。最高风险五分位数组的住院患者在2周和1个月时的随访边际概率高于最低风险五分位数组(分别为34%对30%和51%对47%;两个时间段的P均<0.001)。在整个队列的事件发生时间模型中,风险与1个月随访可能性之间存在轻微的负相关(MAGGIC评分系数=-0.004,95%置信区间[CI]-0.005至-0.003)。黑人退伍军人在2周或1个月时接受随访的可能性较小(调整后的优势比,2周时为0.93[95%CI 0.90-0.97],1个月时为0.93[95%CI 0.89-