Ahmed Abdulaziz F
Arthroscopy. 2025 Jul;41(7):2211-2213. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.001. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
The long head of the biceps tendon is a common source of anterior shoulder pain, frequently addressed during rotator cuff repairs. Surgical management typically involves either tenotomy or tenodesis, each offering distinct advantages and disadvantages. Tenotomy, a straightforward procedure with a short rehabilitation period, is well suited for low-demand patients but carries a higher risk of Popeye deformity and cramping pain. In contrast, tenodesis, which reattaches the long head of the biceps tendon, minimizes these risks and is preferred for younger, active patients. Randomized controlled trials have shown equivalent functional outcomes for both techniques, with tenotomy associated with a higher risk of cosmetic deformity. The choice of a specific technique often reflects patient age, activity demands, and cosmetic concerns. Surgeons are more likely to select tenodesis for younger, male patients. Thus, nonrandomized studies introduce confounding variables and selection bias that can obscure clear recommendations based on the literature.
肱二头肌长头肌腱是肩部前方疼痛的常见原因,在肩袖修复术中经常涉及到。手术治疗通常包括肌腱切断术或肌腱固定术,每种方法都有各自的优缺点。肌腱切断术是一种简单的手术,康复期短,适合需求较低的患者,但发生肱肌畸形和痉挛性疼痛的风险较高。相比之下,肌腱固定术重新附着肱二头肌长头肌腱,将这些风险降至最低,更适合年轻、活跃的患者。随机对照试验表明,两种技术的功能结果相当,但肌腱切断术出现美容畸形的风险更高。具体技术的选择通常反映患者的年龄、活动需求和美容顾虑。外科医生更倾向于为年轻男性患者选择肌腱固定术。因此,非随机研究引入了混杂变量和选择偏倚,可能会模糊基于文献的明确建议。