• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

18 个国家的非传染性疾病家庭经济负担

The household economic burden of non-communicable diseases in 18 countries.

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK.

Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Feb 11;5(2):e002040. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002040. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002040
PMID:32133191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7042605/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of death globally. In 2014, the United Nations committed to reducing premature mortality from NCDs, including by reducing the burden of healthcare costs. Since 2014, the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Study has been collecting health expenditure data from households with NCDs in 18 countries.

METHODS

Using data from the PURE Study, we estimated risk of catastrophic health spending and impoverishment among households with at least one person with NCDs (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, kidney disease, cancer and respiratory diseases; n=17 435), with hypertension only (a leading risk factor for NCDs; n=11 831) or with neither (n=22 654) by country income group: high-income countries (Canada and Sweden), upper middle income countries (UMICs: Brazil, Chile, Malaysia, Poland, South Africa and Turkey), lower middle income countries (LMICs: the Philippines, Colombia, India, Iran and the Occupied Palestinian Territory) and low-income countries (LICs: Bangladesh, Pakistan, Zimbabwe and Tanzania) and China.

RESULTS

The prevalence of catastrophic spending and impoverishment is highest among households with NCDs in LMICs and China. After adjusting for covariates that might drive health expenditure, the absolute risk of catastrophic spending is higher in households with NCDs compared with no NCDs in LMICs (risk difference=1.71%; 95% CI 0.75 to 2.67), UMICs (0.82%; 95% CI 0.37 to 1.27) and China (7.52%; 95% CI 5.88 to 9.16). A similar pattern is observed in UMICs and China for impoverishment. A high proportion of those with NCDs in LICs, especially women (38.7% compared with 12.6% in men), reported not taking medication due to costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that financial protection from healthcare costs for people with NCDs is inadequate, particularly in LMICs and China. While the burden of NCD care may appear greatest in LMICs and China, the burden in LICs may be masked by care foregone due to costs. The high proportion of women reporting foregone care due to cost may in part explain gender inequality in treatment of NCDs.

摘要

背景

非传染性疾病(NCDs)是全球死亡的主要原因。2014 年,联合国承诺通过降低医疗保健成本来减少 NCD 导致的过早死亡。自 2014 年以来,前瞻性城乡流行病学(PURE)研究一直在从 18 个国家的 NCD 患者家庭中收集卫生支出数据。

方法

利用 PURE 研究的数据,我们根据国家收入组(高收入国家:加拿大和瑞典;中上收入国家:巴西、智利、马来西亚、波兰、南非和土耳其;中下收入国家:菲律宾、哥伦比亚、印度、伊朗和被占领巴勒斯坦领土;低收入国家:孟加拉国、巴基斯坦、津巴布韦和坦桑尼亚以及中国),分别估算了患有 NCD(心血管疾病、糖尿病、肾病、癌症和呼吸系统疾病;n=17435)、仅有高血压(NCD 的主要危险因素;n=11831)或两者都没有(n=22654)的家庭中灾难性卫生支出和贫困的风险。

结果

中低收入国家和中国 NCD 患者家庭的灾难性支出和贫困发生率最高。在调整了可能导致卫生支出的协变量后,与无 NCD 家庭相比,中低收入国家(风险差异=1.71%;95%CI 0.75 至 2.67)、中上收入国家(0.82%;95%CI 0.37 至 1.27)和中国(7.52%;95%CI 5.88 至 9.16)NCD 患者家庭发生灾难性支出的绝对风险更高。中低收入国家和中国在贫困方面也存在类似的模式。在中低收入国家,特别是女性(38.7%,而男性为 12.6%),由于费用问题,有很大比例的 NCD 患者未服药。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,NCD 患者的医疗保健费用没有得到充分的财务保护,特别是在中低收入国家和中国。虽然 NCD 护理的负担在中低收入国家和中国似乎最大,但由于费用而放弃护理可能掩盖了低收入国家的负担。由于费用而放弃护理的女性比例较高,这在一定程度上解释了 NCD 治疗中的性别不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2b/7042605/79463cb6e809/bmjgh-2019-002040f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2b/7042605/79463cb6e809/bmjgh-2019-002040f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2b/7042605/79463cb6e809/bmjgh-2019-002040f01.jpg

相似文献

1
The household economic burden of non-communicable diseases in 18 countries.18 个国家的非传染性疾病家庭经济负担
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Feb 11;5(2):e002040. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002040. eCollection 2020.
2
Financial risk protection against noncommunicable diseases: trends and patterns in Bangladesh.金融对非传染性疾病风险的保护:孟加拉国的趋势和模式。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;22(1):1835. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14243-0.
3
Availability and affordability of cardiovascular disease medicines and their effect on use in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: an analysis of the PURE study data.心血管疾病药物的可及性和可负担性及其对高收入、中等收入和低收入国家使用的影响:对 PURE 研究数据的分析。
Lancet. 2016 Jan 2;387(10013):61-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00469-9. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
4
The household financial burden of non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家非传染性疾病的家庭经济负担:一项系统综述
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jun 21;19(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00732-y.
5
Consumption displacement in households with noncommunicable diseases in Bangladesh.孟加拉国非传染性疾病家庭的消费转移。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 13;13(12):e0208504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208504. eCollection 2018.
6
Assessing the household economic burden of non-communicable diseases in India: evidence from repeated cross-sectional surveys.评估印度非传染性疾病的家庭经济负担:来自重复横断面调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 7;21(1):881. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10828-3.
7
Economic Burden of Chronic Ill Health and Injuries for Households in Low- and Middle-Income Countries低收入和中等收入国家家庭慢性疾病和伤害的经济负担
8
Assessing the relationship between out-of-pocket spending on blood pressure and diabetes medication and household catastrophic health expenditure: evidence from Pakistan.评估血压和糖尿病药物自付支出与家庭灾难性卫生支出之间的关系:来自巴基斯坦的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 15;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0906-x.
9
Economic burden of non-communicable diseases on households in Nigeria: evidence from the Nigeria living standard survey 2018-19.尼日利亚非传染性疾病给家庭带来的经济负担:来自 2018-19 年尼日利亚生活水平调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;23(1):1563. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16498-7.
10
The global impact of non-communicable diseases on households and impoverishment: a systematic review.非传染性疾病对家庭和贫困的全球影响:系统评价。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;30(3):163-88. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9983-3. Epub 2014 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
WHF Roadmap on Single Pill Combination Therapies.世界心力衰竭学会单一片剂联合疗法路线图
Glob Heart. 2025 Aug 29;20(1):73. doi: 10.5334/gh.1457. eCollection 2025.
2
Future Best Buys Can and Should Do More Comment on "Barriers and Opportunities for WHO 'Best Buys' Non-Communicable Disease Policy Adoption and Implementation From a Political Economy Perspective: A Complexity Systematic Review".未来的最佳采购能够且应该做得更多 对“从政治经济学角度看世卫组织‘最佳采购’非传染性疾病政策采用与实施的障碍和机遇:一项复杂性系统评价”的评论
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:9047. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.9047. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
3
An evolutionary medicine and life history perspective on aging and disease: Trade-offs, hyperfunction, and mismatch.

本文引用的文献

1
Household economic costs associated with mental, neurological and substance use disorders: a cross-sectional survey in six low- and middle-income countries.与精神、神经和物质使用障碍相关的家庭经济成本:六个低收入和中等收入国家的横断面调查
BJPsych Open. 2019 Apr 8;5(3):e34. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.20.
2
Socioeconomic Gradients and Distribution of Diabetes, Hypertension, and Obesity in India.印度的糖尿病、高血压和肥胖症的社会经济梯度和分布。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e190411. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0411.
3
A systematic review of associations between non-communicable diseases and socioeconomic status within low- and lower-middle-income countries.
从进化医学和生命史角度看衰老与疾病:权衡、功能亢进与失配
Evol Med Public Health. 2025 May 15;13(1):111-124. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoaf010. eCollection 2025.
4
Prescription cost analysis and economic impact of drug treatment in patients with chronic illness, attending the medicine out-patient department in a tertiary care hospital at South Delhi.南德里一家三级护理医院内科门诊慢性病患者的处方成本分析及药物治疗的经济影响
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2025 Jun 20;23(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12962-025-00628-6.
5
Implementation of Community-Centric Medical Education through Family Adoption Program: Descriptive Results from Coastal Karnataka.通过家庭收养计划实施以社区为中心的医学教育:卡纳塔克邦沿海地区的描述性结果
Indian J Community Med. 2025 May-Jun;50(3):479-485. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_694_23. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
6
Use of Preventable Risk Integrated Model on behavioral risk factors: a scoping review and bibliometric analysis.可预防风险综合模型在行为风险因素方面的应用:一项范围综述和文献计量分析
Front Nutr. 2025 May 9;12:1572234. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1572234. eCollection 2025.
7
Effectiveness and Acceptability of Video-Observed Therapy for Tuberculosis Treatment Monitoring: A Scoping Review.视频观察疗法用于结核病治疗监测的有效性和可接受性:一项范围综述
Iran J Public Health. 2025 Mar;54(3):499-508. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i3.18243.
8
Determinants of lost-to-follow-up (LTFU) among National Health Insurance Scheme-insured hypertension and diabetes patients attending accredited health facilities in Ghana.加纳参加国家医疗保险计划的高血压和糖尿病患者在经认可的医疗机构接受治疗时失访的决定因素。
Trop Med Health. 2025 May 6;53(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s41182-025-00743-3.
9
Role of artificial intelligence in early identification and risk evaluation of non-communicable diseases: a bibliometric analysis of global research trends.人工智能在非传染性疾病早期识别与风险评估中的作用:全球研究趋势的文献计量分析
BMJ Open. 2025 May 2;15(5):e101169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101169.
10
Social factors, health policy, and environment: implications for cardiovascular disease across the globe.社会因素、卫生政策与环境:对全球心血管疾病的影响
Eur Heart J. 2025 Aug 8;46(30):2959-2973. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf212.
非传染性疾病与中低收入国家社会经济地位关系的系统评价。
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020409. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020409.
4
Inequalities in the use of secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease by socioeconomic status: evidence from the PURE observational study.社会经济地位对心血管疾病二级预防利用不平等:来自 PURE 观察性研究的证据。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e292-e301. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30031-7.
5
Availability and affordability of blood pressure-lowering medicines and the effect on blood pressure control in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: an analysis of the PURE study data.在高收入、中等收入和低收入国家,降压药物的可及性和可负担性及其对血压控制的影响:对 PURE 研究数据的分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Sep;2(9):e411-e419. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30141-X. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
6
Progress on catastrophic health spending in 133 countries: a retrospective observational study.133 个国家灾难性卫生支出进展情况:回顾性观察研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Feb;6(2):e169-e179. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30429-1. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
7
Socioeconomic status and non-communicable disease behavioural risk factors in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review.社会经济地位与低收入和中低收入国家非传染性疾病行为风险因素:系统评价。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Mar;5(3):e277-e289. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30058-X.
8
Secondary CV Prevention in South America in a Community Setting: The PURE Study.南美洲社区环境下的二级心血管预防:纯粹研究。
Glob Heart. 2017 Dec;12(4):305-313. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
9
The economic burden of chronic non-communicable diseases in rural Malawi: an observational study.马拉维农村慢性非传染性疾病的经济负担:一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 1;16(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1716-8.
10
Acute coronary syndromes in low- and middle-income countries: Moving forward.低收入和中等收入国家的急性冠状动脉综合征:向前迈进。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Aug;217 Suppl:S10-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.213. Epub 2016 Jun 27.