Suppr超能文献

不同表面处理对CAD/CAM聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯义齿牙与热聚合丙烯酸义齿基托粘结强度的评估。

Evaluation of different surface treatments on the bond strength of CAD/CAM PMMA denture teeth to heat-polymerized acrylic denture base.

作者信息

Alhomsi Nour Alhouda, Almustafa Ammar, Alzoubi Hasan

机构信息

Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Damascus, Damascus, Syria.

Department of Pediatric Dentistry Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Damascus, Damascus, Syria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):1255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85840-3.

Abstract

This in vitro study aims to evaluate various surface treatments on the shear bond strength and failure mode of CAD/CAM PMMA teeth to the heat-polymerized acrylic denture base. The study sample consisted of 100 teeth that were divided equally into five groups: Group 1: denture artificial teeth (control), Group 2: PMMA teeth without surface treatment, Group 3: PMMA teeth with MMA etching, Group 4: PMMA teeth with sandblasting (aluminum oxide particles), and Group 5: PMMA teeth with perpendicular grooves. The shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine and the failure mode was recorded. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). MMA increased the shear bond strength compared with other surface treatments (sandblasting and perpendicular grooves; P < 0.001). Sandblasting and perpendicular grooves showed no significant difference in the shear bond strength (P = 0.548 and 0.061; respectively). There were statistically significant differences in the frequencies of failure mode between the studied groups (P < 0.001). The control, PMMA, and PMMA + Sandblasting groups showed the weakest bonding. MMA application improved the shear bond strength for CAD/CAM PMMA teeth, the perpendicular groove seems to be not sufficiently effective, while the sandblasting cannot be considered as a surface treatment.

摘要

这项体外研究旨在评估各种表面处理对CAD/CAM聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)牙齿与热聚合丙烯酸义齿基托之间的剪切粘结强度和失效模式的影响。研究样本包括100颗牙齿,平均分为五组:第1组:义齿人工牙(对照组),第2组:未进行表面处理的PMMA牙齿,第3组:经甲基丙烯酸甲酯(MMA)蚀刻的PMMA牙齿,第4组:经喷砂处理(氧化铝颗粒)的PMMA牙齿,第5组:有垂直凹槽的PMMA牙齿。使用万能试验机进行剪切粘结强度测试,并记录失效模式。数据采用方差分析,随后进行Tukey事后检验(α = 0.05)。与其他表面处理(喷砂和垂直凹槽)相比,MMA提高了剪切粘结强度(P < 0.001)。喷砂和垂直凹槽在剪切粘结强度方面无显著差异(分别为P = 0.548和0.061)。研究组之间在失效模式频率上存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.001)。对照组、PMMA组和PMMA + 喷砂组显示出最弱的粘结。应用MMA提高了CAD/CAM PMMA牙齿的剪切粘结强度,垂直凹槽似乎效果不够显著,而喷砂不能被视为一种表面处理方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a8/11711156/4b5b3ef3a629/41598_2025_85840_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Bond strength comparison of chemically activated hard reline materials on CAD-CAM milled and conventional heat-polymerized PMMA denture bases.
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Mar;133(3):889.e1-889.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.001. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
3
The effects of different surface treatments applied to milled PMMA denture base material on repair bond strength.
Odontology. 2023 Oct;111(4):953-970. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00806-z. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
5
Shear bond strength of denture teeth to two chemically different denture base resins after various surface treatments.
J Prosthodont. 2014 Feb;23(2):152-6. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12081. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
6
Bonding of acrylic denture teeth to MMA/PMMA and light-curing denture base materials: the role of conditioning liquids.
J Dent. 2012 Mar;40(3):210-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.010. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
7
Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Acrylic Teeth to Denture Base after Various Chemical Surface Treatments: An Study.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Jun 1;25(6):514-517. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3670.
9
Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength Between Denture Teeth and 3D-Printed Denture Base Resin.
J Prosthodont. 2023 Apr;32(S1):3-10. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13527. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
10
Shear bond strength of denture teeth to heat- and light-polymerized denture base resin.
J Prosthodont. 2011 Jan;20(1):52-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00639.x. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of retention hole designs in artificial teeth on failure resistance of the connection with thermoplastic resin.
Dent Mater J. 2022 Jul 30;41(4):573-579. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2021-328. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
4
Comparison of shear bond strengths of different types of denture teeth to different denture base resins.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Dec;12(6):376-382. doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.6.376. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
5
Shear bond strength between CAD/CAM denture base resin and denture artificial teeth when bonded with resin cement.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Oct;12(5):251-258. doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.251. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
6
Comparison of Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed, CAD/CAM, and Conventional Denture Base Materials.
J Prosthodont. 2020 Jul;29(6):524-528. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13175. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
7
Comparison of Bond Strength of Acrylic, Composite, and Nanocomposite Artificial Teeth to Heat-Cure Acrylic Denture Base Resin.
Front Dent. 2019 May-Jun;16(3):166-172. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i3.1587. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
8
Bond Strength of Denture Teeth to Heat-Cured, CAD/CAM and 3D Printed Denture Acrylics.
J Prosthodont. 2020 Jun;29(5):415-421. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13125. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
10
A Comparison of the Surface Properties of CAD/CAM and Conventional Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA).
J Prosthodont. 2019 Apr;28(4):452-457. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13033. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验