Dewar Anna E, Belcher Laurence J, West Stuart A
Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
St John's College, Oxford, UK.
Nat Rev Genet. 2025 Jun;26(6):395-405. doi: 10.1038/s41576-024-00803-0. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
Comparative genomics, whereby the genomes of different species are compared, has the potential to address broad and fundamental questions at the intersection of genetics and evolution. However, species, genomes and genes cannot be considered as independent data points within statistical tests. Closely related species tend to be similar because they share genes by common descent, which must be accounted for in analyses. This problem of non-independence may be exacerbated when examining genomes or genes but can be addressed by applying phylogeny-based methods to comparative genomic analyses. Here, we review how controlling for phylogeny can change the conclusions of comparative genomics studies. We address common questions on how to apply these methods and illustrate how they can be used to test causal hypotheses. The combination of rapidly expanding genomic datasets and phylogenetic comparative methods is set to revolutionize the biological insights possible from comparative genomic studies.
比较基因组学是对不同物种的基因组进行比较,它有潜力解决遗传学与进化交叉领域广泛而基础的问题。然而,在统计检验中,物种、基因组和基因不能被视为独立的数据点。亲缘关系较近的物种往往相似,因为它们通过共同祖先继承了相同的基因,这在分析中必须加以考虑。在研究基因组或基因时,这种非独立性问题可能会加剧,但可以通过将基于系统发育的方法应用于比较基因组分析来解决。在这里,我们回顾了控制系统发育如何改变比较基因组学研究的结论。我们回答了关于如何应用这些方法的常见问题,并说明了它们如何用于检验因果假设。快速扩展的基因组数据集与系统发育比较方法的结合,必将彻底改变比较基因组学研究所能获得的生物学见解。