Suppr超能文献

超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与伤口浸润用于腹腔镜活体供肾切除术后镇痛的效果比较:一项双盲随机对照试验

Efficacy of ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block compared to wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Loganathan Sekar, Kajal Kamal, Garg Kashish, Sethi Sameer, Kenwar Deepesh B, Sharma Amit, Aditya Ashish, Mahajan Varun, Naik Naveen B, Kumar Rajnikant

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Anaesthesia Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani, West Bengal, India.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan 8;25(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02786-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain remains a significant problem in patients undergoing donor nephrectomy despite reduced tissue trauma following laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN). Inadequately treated pain leads to physiological and psychological consequences, including chronic neuropathic pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled double-blinded trial was conducted in sixty-nine (n = 69) participants who underwent LLDN under general anesthesia. Participants were randomized into Group B (n = 34) and Group C (n = 35). Group B received ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with bupivacaine 0.125% 20 ml on the surgical side and 10 ml on the contralateral side before extubation, while Group C received wound infiltration with bupivacaine 0.125% 15 ml. The primary objective of the study was to compare cumulative 24-hour morphine consumption postoperatively. The secondary objectives were time to first rescue analgesia, visual numeric rating scale (VNRS) pain scores at rest and during movement, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and complications associated with ESPB.

RESULTS

Participants in Group B required significantly less median (IQR) 24-hour morphine compared to Group C [6 (6-9) mg vs. 15 (12-15) mg; median difference 9; 95% CI in median difference 6-12; p < 0.001), longer median (IQR) time to first rescue analgesia [6 (6-8) hours vs. 1 (1-2) hours; p < 0.001], and lower VNRS at rest and during movement at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided ESPB provided effective pain relief compared to wound infiltration with local anaesthetic in patients who underwent LLDN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

INT/IEC/2021/SPL-514; CTRI/2021/07/045909.

摘要

背景

尽管腹腔镜活体供肾切除术(LLDN)后组织创伤有所减少,但供肾切除术后疼痛仍是患者面临的一个重大问题。疼痛治疗不充分会导致生理和心理后果,包括慢性神经性疼痛。

材料与方法

本随机对照双盲试验纳入了69例在全身麻醉下接受LLDN的参与者。参与者被随机分为B组(n = 34)和C组(n = 35)。B组在拔管前于手术侧接受超声引导下双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB),注射0.125%布比卡因20 ml,对侧注射10 ml,而C组接受0.125%布比卡因15 ml伤口浸润。本研究的主要目的是比较术后24小时吗啡累积用量。次要目的是首次补救镇痛时间、静息和活动时的视觉数字评分量表(VNRS)疼痛评分、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率以及与ESPB相关的并发症。

结果

与C组相比,B组参与者术后24小时吗啡中位(IQR)用量显著更少[6(6 - 9)mg对15(12 - 15)mg;中位差异9;中位差异的95% CI 6 - 12;p < 0.001],首次补救镇痛的中位(IQR)时间更长[6(6 - 8)小时对1(1 - 2)小时;p < 0.001],并且在基线、0.5、1、2、4、6、8、12、24小时时静息和活动时的VNRS更低。

结论

与局部麻醉剂伤口浸润相比,超声引导下的ESPB为接受LLDN的患者提供了有效的疼痛缓解。

试验注册

INT/IEC/2021/SPL - 514;CTRI/2021/07/045909。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/590c/11707949/7e1a95865182/12871_2024_2786_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验