Zotev Vadim, McQuaid Jessica R, Robertson-Benta Cidney R, Hittson Anne K, Wick Tracey V, Nathaniel Upasana, Miller Samuel D, Ling Josef M, van der Horn Harm J, Mayer Andrew R
The Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Jan;46(1):e70127. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70127.
Evaluation of mechanisms of action of EEG neurofeedback (EEG-nf) using simultaneous fMRI is highly desirable to ensure its effective application for clinical rehabilitation and therapy. Counterbalancing training runs with active neurofeedback and sham (neuro)feedback for each participant is a promising approach to demonstrate specificity of training effects to the active neurofeedback. We report the first study in which EEG-nf procedure is both evaluated using simultaneous fMRI and controlled via the counterbalanced active-sham study design. Healthy volunteers (n = 18) used EEG-nf to upregulate frontal theta EEG asymmetry (FTA) during fMRI while performing tasks that involved mental generation of a random numerical sequence and serial summation of numbers in the sequence. The FTA was defined as power asymmetry for channels F3 and F4 in [4-7] Hz band. Sham feedback was provided based on asymmetry of motion-related artifacts. The experimental procedure included two training runs with the active EEG-nf and two training runs with the sham feedback, in a randomized order. The participants showed significantly more positive FTA changes during the active EEG-nf conditions compared to the sham conditions, associated with significantly higher theta EEG power changes for channel F3. Temporal correlations between the FTA and fMRI activities of prefrontal, parietal, and occipital brain regions were significantly enhanced during the active EEG-nf conditions compared to the sham conditions. Temporal correlation between theta EEG power for channel F3 and fMRI activity of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was also significantly enhanced. Significant active-vs-sham difference in fMRI activations was observed for the left DLPFC. Our results demonstrate that mechanisms of EEG-nf training can be reliably evaluated using the counterbalanced active-sham study design and simultaneous fMRI.
使用同步功能磁共振成像(fMRI)评估脑电图神经反馈(EEG-nf)的作用机制,对于确保其在临床康复和治疗中的有效应用非常必要。对每位参与者的主动神经反馈和假(神经)反馈训练进行平衡,是证明训练效果对主动神经反馈具有特异性的一种有前景的方法。我们报告了第一项研究,其中EEG-nf程序既通过同步fMRI进行评估,又通过平衡的主动-假研究设计进行控制。健康志愿者(n = 18)在fMRI期间使用EEG-nf上调额叶θ脑电图不对称性(FTA),同时执行涉及随机数字序列的心理生成和序列中数字的连续求和的任务。FTA被定义为[4-7]Hz频段中F3和F4通道的功率不对称性。基于与运动相关伪影的不对称性提供假反馈。实验程序包括两次主动EEG-nf训练和两次假反馈训练,顺序随机。与假反馈条件相比,参与者在主动EEG-nf条件下显示出显著更多的正向FTA变化,这与F3通道显著更高的θ脑电图功率变化相关。与假反馈条件相比,在主动EEG-nf条件下,额叶、顶叶和枕叶脑区的FTA与fMRI活动之间的时间相关性显著增强。F3通道的θ脑电图功率与左背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)的fMRI活动之间的时间相关性也显著增强。在左DLPFC观察到fMRI激活的主动与假反馈之间的显著差异。我们的结果表明,使用平衡的主动-假研究设计和同步fMRI可以可靠地评估EEG-nf训练的机制。