Evangelou Nikos, Mattoscio Miriam, Coutts Mhairi, Andiappan Manoharan, Sawtell Teresa, Rhys Katherine
From the Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences Academic Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
MS Service, Queen's Hospital, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Essex, United Kingdom.
Int J MS Care. 2025 Jan 6;27(Q1):1-7. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2023-079. eCollection 2025 Jan.
The PANORAMA survey aimed to assess current treatment practice for individuals with new diagnoses of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in the United Kingdom and to explore variations in treatment approaches with an emphasis on escalation vs early high-efficacy treatment (HET) and treatment goals.
Health care professionals (HCPs) from the UK treating patients with RRMS took part in interviews facilitated by a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively using quantitative or qualitative methods, as appropriate.
Thirty-eight HCPs from 38 UK centers took part in the survey, including 20 MS consultants and 13 MS specialist nurses. Seventy-four percent (n = 28 of 38) of HCPs strongly agreed and 24% (9 of 38) agreed that early treatment is essential for better outcomes. HCPs reported that they currently treat a mean (SD) of 58.3% (20.8%) and 42.1% (21.8%) of patients with new diagnoses of RRMS with early HET or escalation approaches, respectively. Thirty-four percent (13 of 38) of HCPs reported a discrepancy between current treatment approach and the approach they would like to take, which would be 66.2% favoring early HET and 33.8% favoring escalation approaches. The factors influencing the choice of treatment approach were overall patient health profile (45%, 17 of 38) and patient choice (39%, 15 of 38). The most important treatment goals were to reduce relapses (63%, 24 of 38), delay disability progression (58%, 22 of 38), and maintain quality of life (50%, 19 of 38).
The survey highlights variation among HCPs in the UK in current vs ideal use of escalation or early HET approaches and factors influencing choice of treatment approach.
全景调查旨在评估英国新诊断为复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者的当前治疗实践,并探讨治疗方法的差异,重点是逐步升级治疗与早期高效治疗(HET)以及治疗目标。
来自英国治疗RRMS患者的医疗保健专业人员(HCP)参与了由结构化问卷促成的访谈。根据情况,使用定量或定性方法对数据进行描述性分析。
来自英国38个中心的38名HCP参与了调查,包括20名MS顾问和13名MS专科护士。74%(38人中的28人)的HCP强烈同意,24%(38人中的9人)同意早期治疗对于获得更好的结果至关重要。HCP报告称,他们目前分别使用早期HET或逐步升级治疗方法治疗新诊断RRMS患者的平均比例(标准差)为58.3%(20.8%)和42.1%(21.8%)。34%(38人中的13人)的HCP报告称当前治疗方法与他们希望采用的方法之间存在差异,其中66.2%倾向于早期HET,33.8%倾向于逐步升级治疗方法。影响治疗方法选择的因素是患者总体健康状况(45%,38人中的17人)和患者选择(39%,38人中的15人)。最重要的治疗目标是减少复发(63%,38人中的24人)、延缓残疾进展(58%,38人中的22人)以及维持生活质量(50%,38人中的19人)。
该调查突出了英国HCP在当前与理想使用逐步升级治疗或早期HET方法以及影响治疗方法选择的因素方面存在差异。