• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用三种不同儿童旋转系统对乳磨牙根尖碎屑挤出情况的比较评估:一项研究。

Comparative Evaluation of Apical Debris Extrusion in Primary Molars Using Three Different Pediatric Rotary Systems: An Study.

作者信息

Manoharan Muthusamy, Kowsalya Senthilnathan, Mathian Veerabadhran Mahesh, Gawthaman Murugesan, Vinodh Selvaraj, Kamatchi Mohanraj

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Nov;17(11):1224-1228. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2989. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2989
PMID:39781393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11703772/
Abstract

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Failure of the endodontic treatment might be due to various reasons like zipping, apical blockade, ledging, debris extrusion, etc. Apical debris extrusion in primary teeth is of major concern as it does not have a proper well-developed apex, that is, mature apex. This study aims to compare and evaluate the apical debris extrusion in primary molars using three different pediatric rotary file system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty freshly extracted teeth primary molars were divided into three experimental groups according to the used file systems as group I-NT Pedo Gold, group II-Pedo Flex, and group III-Kedo-S. Debris extruded during canal shaping were collected in preweighed vials. Each canal was irrigated with 6 mL of saline and 2 mL of sodium hypochlorite. The amount of debris extruded from each tooth was calculated by subtracting the preinstrumentation from the postinstrumentation measurement. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey tests with = 0.05.

RESULTS

Kedo-S showed statistically significant lesser apical debris extrusion than Pedo Flex and NT Pedo Gold (-value < 0.001) while comparing Pedo Flex and NT Pedo Gold insignificant difference.

CONCLUSION

All three pediatric rotary file systems extruded debris apically; while Kedo-S can be safely used as a rotary file in pediatric dentistry with minimal apical debris extrusion.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

An ideal rotary instrument should not extrude debris apically, the lesser the extrusion greater the endodontic treatment success. Kedo-S can be securely used as a rotary file with less apical debris extrusion than the other two rotary systems.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Manoharan M, Kowsalya S, Mathian VM, Comparative Evaluation of Apical Debris Extrusion in Primary Molars Using Three Different Pediatric Rotary Systems: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(11):1224-1228.

摘要

目的与背景

根管治疗失败可能由多种原因引起,如根管拉链、根尖阻塞、台阶形成、碎屑挤出等。乳牙的根尖碎屑挤出是一个主要问题,因为乳牙没有发育完善的根尖,即成熟根尖。本研究旨在比较和评估使用三种不同儿童旋转锉系统时乳牙磨牙的根尖碎屑挤出情况。

材料与方法

30颗新鲜拔除的乳牙磨牙根据所使用的锉系统分为三个实验组,即I组-NT Pedo Gold、II组-Pedo Flex和III组-Kedo-S。根管预备过程中挤出的碎屑收集在预先称重的小瓶中。每个根管先用6 mL生理盐水冲洗,再用2 mL次氯酸钠冲洗。每颗牙齿挤出的碎屑量通过将预备后测量值减去预备前测量值来计算。数据采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey检验进行分析,α = 0.05。

结果

与Pedo Flex和NT Pedo Gold相比,Kedo-S的根尖碎屑挤出在统计学上显著更少(P值<0.001),而Pedo Flex和NT Pedo Gold之间无显著差异。

结论

所有三种儿童旋转锉系统都会向根尖挤出碎屑;而Kedo-S作为儿童牙科的旋转锉使用时,根尖碎屑挤出最少,可以安全使用。

临床意义

理想的旋转器械不应向根尖挤出碎屑,挤出量越少,根管治疗成功的可能性越大。Kedo-S作为旋转锉使用时,根尖碎屑挤出比其他两种旋转系统少,可以安全使用。

如何引用本文

Manoharan M, Kowsalya S, Mathian VM, 比较评估三种不同儿童旋转系统在乳牙磨牙中的根尖碎屑挤出情况:一项研究。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2024;17(11):1224 - 1228。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ce6/11703772/f5d49961daba/ijcpd-17-1224-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ce6/11703772/fc2b1c508385/ijcpd-17-1224-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ce6/11703772/f2bf2abfd232/ijcpd-17-1224-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ce6/11703772/f5d49961daba/ijcpd-17-1224-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ce6/11703772/fc2b1c508385/ijcpd-17-1224-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ce6/11703772/f2bf2abfd232/ijcpd-17-1224-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ce6/11703772/f5d49961daba/ijcpd-17-1224-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Apical Debris Extrusion in Primary Molars Using Three Different Pediatric Rotary Systems: An Study.使用三种不同儿童旋转系统对乳磨牙根尖碎屑挤出情况的比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Nov;17(11):1224-1228. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2989. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficiency and Apical Extrusion of Debris Using Two Pediatric Rotary Endodontic Files: An Study.使用两种儿童旋转根管锉对清洁效率和碎屑根尖挤出的比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;14(2):196-200. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1918.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Anterior Teeth using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An Study.使用两种不同旋转系统和手动锉对乳前牙根尖碎屑挤出情况的比较评估:一项研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):512-516. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_884_18.
4
Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Quality of Obturation Using Different Pediatric Rotary File Systems in Primary Teeth.使用不同儿童旋转锉系统对乳牙根管充填质量的锥形束计算机断层扫描评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):542-547. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2000.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study.使用两种不同旋转系统和手动锉对乳上颌前牙根尖碎屑挤出情况的比较评估:一项体外研究
Children (Basel). 2023 May 18;10(5):898. doi: 10.3390/children10050898.
6
Apical extrusion of debris after canal shaping with three single-file systems.使用三种单根管器械进行根管预备后碎屑的根尖挤出情况。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Jan;23(1):79-83. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_319_19.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对乳牙中手用K锉、ProTaper旋转锉和Kedo S旋转锉进行根管预备时的牙本质去除和锥度的比较评估。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):332-336. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787.
8
Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An study.使用三种不同热机械热处理锉系统并搭配两种不同运动方式对根尖挤出碎屑进行的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2022 May-Jun;25(3):269-273. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_631_20. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
9
Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.不同导丝路径锉对弯曲根管内根尖碎屑推出的影响。
J Endod. 2018 Jul;44(7):1191-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
10
Comparative Evaluation of Debris Extrusion, Remaining Dentin Thickness and Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Rotary and Reciprocating Endodontic File Systems: An In Vitro Study.使用旋转和往复式根管锉系统对根管治疗牙齿的碎屑挤出、剩余牙本质厚度和抗折性的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 22;15(7):e42290. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42290. eCollection 2023 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Preparation With Different Instruments in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.乳牙使用不同器械进行根管预备后的术后疼痛:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70180. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70180.

本文引用的文献

1
Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Quality of Obturation Using Different Pediatric Rotary File Systems in Primary Teeth.使用不同儿童旋转锉系统对乳牙根管充填质量的锥形束计算机断层扫描评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):542-547. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2000.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficiency and Apical Extrusion of Debris Using Two Pediatric Rotary Endodontic Files: An Study.使用两种儿童旋转根管锉对清洁效率和碎屑根尖挤出的比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;14(2):196-200. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1918.
3
Apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study.
在乳牙的椭圆形根管预备中,手动与机动器械根尖碎屑推出的体外比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 16;11(1):3859. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83522-4.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对乳牙中手用K锉、ProTaper旋转锉和Kedo S旋转锉进行根管预备时的牙本质去除和锥度的比较评估。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):332-336. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Anterior Teeth using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An Study.使用两种不同旋转系统和手动锉对乳前牙根尖碎屑挤出情况的比较评估:一项研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):512-516. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_884_18.
6
Kedo-S Paediatric Rotary Files for Root Canal Preparation in Primary Teeth - Case Report.用于乳牙根管预备的Kedo-S儿童旋转锉——病例报告
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZR03-ZR05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25856.9508. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
7
Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris using Two Niti Systems Associated with Two İrrigation Techniques in Primary Teeth.使用两种镍钛系统联合两种冲洗技术评估乳牙根尖部挤出碎屑情况
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(6):490-495. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.6.490.
8
Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files.使用三种不同的旋转系统和手动锉对乳磨牙根管预备过程中根尖挤出碎屑的评估。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Sep;26(5):357-63. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12208. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
9
Evaluation of a modified Pulpotec endodontic approach on necrotic primary molars: a one-year follow-up.改良Pulpotec牙髓治疗方法用于坏死乳磨牙的评估:一年随访
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Jun;16(2):111-4.
10
Effects of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex instruments on crack formation in dentin.ProTaper通用型、ProTaper Next和HyFlex器械对牙本质中裂纹形成的影响。
J Endod. 2014 Sep;40(9):1482-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.026. Epub 2014 Apr 13.