Mostafa Mohammed M, Ahmed Hesham H, Ashry Amr
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Assiut University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shibin el Kom, Egypt.
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2024 Dec;21(4):197-200. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2024.145873. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
Spontaneous pneumothorax is a life-threatening thoracic condition that could be either primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) in the absence of an underlying lung disease or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) in the presence of an underlying lung disease. In the case of recurrent, contralateral spontaneous pneumothorax or persistent air leak with a chest drain, surgery with bullectomy associated with pleurectomy or pleurodesis is the gold standard management.
To compare two different techniques for bullectomy, either by using staplers or by hand sewing.
Retrospective review of all patients with spontaneous pneumothorax who underwent bullectomy and pleurectomy by thoracotomy. Group A (30 patients) had repair by using staplers and group B (30 patients) had repair using the hand sewing technique.
The mean operative cost was 4400 ±433.4 Egyptian pounds (EGP) versus EGP 2733.3 ±253.7 in group A and group B respectively ( = 0.001). Mean post-operative cost was 1000 ±100 EGP in group A compared to EGP 2060 ±154.4 in group B ( = 0.0001). Duration of air leak was 1.8 ±1.095 and 9.1 ±3.2 days in group A and group B, respectively ( = 0.0001). Re-exploration occurred in 1 patient in group A (3.3%) and 2 patients in group B (6.6%) ( = 0.5).
The operative cost was significantly higher in the stapler group compared to the hand sewing technique group. However, the duration of post-operative air leak, post-operative hospital stay and post-operative cost were significantly lower in the stapler group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the re-exploration rate after surgery.
自发性气胸是一种危及生命的胸部疾病,可分为无潜在肺部疾病的原发性自发性气胸(PSP)或存在潜在肺部疾病的继发性自发性气胸(SSP)。对于复发性、对侧自发性气胸或胸腔闭式引流后持续漏气的情况,行肺大疱切除术联合胸膜切除术或胸膜固定术的手术是金标准治疗方法。
比较两种不同的肺大疱切除技术,即使用吻合器或手工缝合。
回顾性分析所有经开胸手术行肺大疱切除术和胸膜切除术的自发性气胸患者。A组(30例患者)采用吻合器修复,B组(30例患者)采用手工缝合技术修复。
A组和B组的平均手术费用分别为4400±433.4埃及镑(EGP)和2733.3±253.7埃及镑(P = 0.001)。A组术后平均费用为1000±100埃及镑,而B组为2060±154.4埃及镑(P = 0.0001)。A组和B组的漏气持续时间分别为1.8±1.095天和9.1±3.2天(P = 0.0001)。A组有1例患者(3.3%)需要再次手术,B组有2例患者(6.6%)需要再次手术(P = 0.5)。
与手工缝合技术组相比,吻合器组的手术费用显著更高。然而,吻合器组的术后漏气持续时间、术后住院时间和术后费用显著更低。两组术后再次手术率无显著差异。