• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中风后认知障碍的预测模型:系统评价与荟萃分析

Prediction Models for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Yang Yifang, Chen Yajing, Yang Yiyi, Yang Tingting, Wu Tingting, Chen Junbo, Yan Fanghong, Han Lin, Ma Yuxia

机构信息

School of Nursing, Evidence-Based Nursing Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Department of Nursing, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Public Health Nurs. 2025 May-Jun;42(3):1375-1388. doi: 10.1111/phn.13509. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1111/phn.13509
PMID:39786328
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stroke is one of the most serious illnesses worldwide and is the primary cause of acquired disability among adults. Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a complication of stroke that significantly impacts patients' daily activities and social functions. Therefore, developing a risk prediction model for PSCI is essential for identifying and preventing disease progression.

OBJECTIVES

This study systematically reviewed and analyzed PSCI prediction models, identifying the associated risk factors.

METHODS

We systematically retrieved literature from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and other sources. Two researchers independently extracted the literature and assessed the risk of bias using the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist and The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).

RESULTS

A total of 20 articles describe the PSCI prediction model, with an incidence rate ranging from 8% to 75%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value for the development models ranged from 0.66 to 0.969, while the validation models ranged from 0.763 to 0.893. Age, diabetes, hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), hypertension, and homocysteine (hcy) were identified as the strongest predictors.

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review, several PSCI prediction models demonstrate promising prediction performance, although they often lack external validation and exhibit high heterogeneity in some predictive factors. Therefore, we recommend that medical practitioners utilize a comprehensive set of predictive factors to screen for high-risk PSCI patients. Furthermore, future research should prioritize refining and validating existing models by incorporating novel variables and methodologies.

摘要

背景

中风是全球最严重的疾病之一,是成年人后天残疾的主要原因。中风后认知障碍(PSCI)是中风的一种并发症,会显著影响患者的日常活动和社交功能。因此,开发PSCI风险预测模型对于识别和预防疾病进展至关重要。

目的

本研究系统回顾和分析PSCI预测模型,识别相关风险因素。

方法

我们系统地从PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和其他来源检索文献。两名研究人员独立提取文献,并使用预测模型研究系统评价的关键评估和数据提取(CHARMS)清单以及预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估偏倚风险。

结果

共有20篇文章描述了PSCI预测模型,发病率从8%到75%不等。开发模型的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)值范围为0.66至0.969,而验证模型的范围为0.763至0.893。年龄、糖尿病、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、高血压和同型半胱氨酸(hcy)被确定为最强的预测因素。

结论

在本系统评价中,尽管一些PSCI预测模型往往缺乏外部验证且在某些预测因素上表现出高度异质性,但仍显示出有前景的预测性能。因此,我们建议医生利用一套全面的预测因素来筛查PSCI高危患者。此外,未来的研究应优先通过纳入新变量和方法来完善和验证现有模型。

相似文献

1
Prediction Models for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中风后认知障碍的预测模型:系统评价与荟萃分析
Public Health Nurs. 2025 May-Jun;42(3):1375-1388. doi: 10.1111/phn.13509. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
2
Systematic review and validation of prediction rules for identifying children with serious infections in emergency departments and urgent-access primary care.系统评价和验证预测规则,以识别急诊科和紧急初级保健中严重感染的儿童。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(15):1-100. doi: 10.3310/hta16150.
3
The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.生物标志物对改良心脏风险指数在预测非心脏手术患者主要不良心脏事件和全因死亡率方面的比较和附加预后价值。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD013139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013139.pub2.
4
The Effectiveness of Computerized Cognitive Training in Patients With Poststroke Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.计算机化认知训练对脑卒中后认知障碍患者的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 12;27:e73140. doi: 10.2196/73140.
5
Response prediction for neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer patients-improvement in decision-making: A systematic review.局部晚期直肠癌患者新辅助治疗的反应预测——决策制定的改进:一项系统评价
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov 15:109463. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109463.
6
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
7
Risk prediction models for deep venous thrombosis in patients with acute stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.急性脑卒中患者深静脉血栓形成的风险预测模型:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Jan;149:104623. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104623. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
A nomogram for predicting post-stroke cognitive impairment no dementia in patients with first-ever mild ischemic stroke.一种用于预测首次发生轻度缺血性卒中患者卒中后无痴呆的认知障碍的列线图。
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 19;16:1618953. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1618953. eCollection 2025.