Suppr超能文献

淋巴瘘——淋巴结内淋巴管造影优先策略的成功应用。

Lymphatic leaks - success of intranodal lymphangiogram first strategy.

作者信息

Campbell Alan, Velazquez-Pimentel Diana, Seager Matthew, Hesketh Richard, Hague Julian, Raja Jowad, Brookes Jocelyn, Ngo An, Walkden Miles, Papadopoulou Anthie, Smith Daron, Mohammadi Borzoueh, Barod Ravi, Akhtar Mohammed Rashid, Tun Jimmy Kyaw, Low Deborah Elise, Renfrew Ian Daniel, Fotheringham Tim, von Stempel Conrad

机构信息

University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

CVIR Endovasc. 2025 Jan 9;8(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s42155-024-00499-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic leaks are associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Intranodal lymphangiography (ILAG) involves the direct injection of ethiodised lipid into the hilum of lymph nodes. It is diagnostic procedure that can have therapeutic effects secondary to a local sclerosant effect. The aim of the study is to describe the technical and clinical success of ILAG and adjunctive lymphatic interventions performed as first line interventional techniques for lymphatic leaks refractory to conservative and medical management in a multicentre cohort of patients with symptomatic large volume lymphatic leaks.

METHODS

Multicentre retrospective study of all lymphatic interventions performed between 2017-2023 in patients with large volume lymphatic leaks (> 500 ml a day). Intranodal lymphangiography was performed initially with technical success defined as opacification of the lymphatics at the aortic bifurcation and demonstration of lymphatic leak on the index ILAG procedure or immediate post procedural CT was recorded. Lymphatic embolisation was performed with a combination of direct puncture or transvenous cannulation with glue and or coil embolisation of the thoracic duct or leak point and in cases with refractory leak. Clinical success was defined as reduction in drain output to less than 20 mL per 24 h, or no further insensible lymph leak. Time to clinical success after ILAG and adjunctive embolisation was recorded.

RESULTS

ILAG alone lead to clinical success in 14 of 32 (44%) patients after a median of 14 days. Subsequent embolisation was performed in 12 refractory cases; this was successful in 8 (67%) at median of 8 days. Overall clinical success of all lymphatic interventions was 69% (22 of 32 patients) at a median of 11 days (IQR 5-34). No statistically significant correlation between the site of leakage, aetiology or embolisation technique correlated with clinical success. Decision to proceed to repeat ILAG or an adjunct procedure was made on a clinical basis, following multidisciplinary discussion.

CONCLUSIONS

ILAG can be employed a first line interventional therapeutic technique to treat clinically significant lymphatic leaks that are refractory to conservative and medical management. Adjunctive procedures, including embolisation, can be considered as part of clinical decision making after a period of 1-2 weeks' watchful waiting in continuingly refractory cases.

摘要

背景

淋巴漏与显著的死亡率和发病率相关。结内淋巴管造影术(ILAG)包括将碘化油直接注入淋巴结门部。这是一种诊断性操作,因其局部硬化剂作用可产生治疗效果。本研究的目的是描述ILAG及辅助性淋巴干预措施作为一线介入技术,在多中心队列中有症状的大量淋巴漏患者中,对保守治疗和药物治疗无效的淋巴漏的技术成功率和临床成功率。

方法

对2017年至2023年期间对大量淋巴漏(每天>500毫升)患者进行的所有淋巴干预措施进行多中心回顾性研究。最初进行结内淋巴管造影术,技术成功定义为主动脉分叉处淋巴管显影,且在首次ILAG操作或术后即刻CT上显示淋巴漏。对于难治性淋巴漏,采用直接穿刺或经静脉插管联合胶水和/或线圈栓塞胸导管或漏点的方法进行淋巴栓塞。临床成功定义为引流量减少至每24小时少于20毫升,或无进一步的隐性淋巴漏。记录ILAG和辅助栓塞术后达到临床成功的时间。

结果

仅ILAG治疗的32例患者中有14例(44%)在中位时间14天后获得临床成功。随后对12例难治性病例进行了栓塞;其中8例(67%)在中位时间8天后成功。所有淋巴干预措施的总体临床成功率为69%(32例患者中的22例),中位时间为11天(四分位间距5 - 34)。漏出部位、病因或栓塞技术与临床成功之间无统计学显著相关性。在多学科讨论后,根据临床情况决定是否进行重复ILAG或辅助操作。

结论

ILAG可作为一线介入治疗技术,用于治疗对保守治疗和药物治疗无效的具有临床意义的淋巴漏。对于持续难治的病例,在经过1 - 2周的密切观察后,辅助操作(包括栓塞)可作为临床决策的一部分加以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c33/11718034/da674f7cb3fa/42155_2024_499_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验