Douchet Tom, Paizis Christos, Babault Nicolas
INSERM UMR1093-CAPS, University of Bourgogne, University of Franche-Comté of Sport Sciences, Dijon, France -
Centre d'Expertise de la Performance, University of Bourgogne, University of Franche-Comté of Sport Sciences, Dijon, France -
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2025 Apr;65(4):478-485. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16292-5. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
Highly trained academy soccer practitioners usually implement an aerobic-oriented session followed by a speed-oriented session during the first and second heavy load session of a training week, respectively. This study aimed to investigate if the order of these physical training sessions would influence the external training loads and the subsequent readiness level on match day.
Twenty-five highly trained academy soccer players (12 U17 and 13 U19) participated in two experimental weeks randomly presented. The AEROBIC-SPEED periodization implemented an aerobic-oriented session on MD-4 and a speed-oriented session on MD-2. The SPEED-AEROBIC periodization did the opposite. During these two sessions, players wore a global positioning system and rated their perceived exertion (RPE). Players were also tested on MD-4 for baseline values (CONTROL) and match-day (TEST). Tests included a counter movement jump (CMJ), a 20-m sprint, the Illinois agility test (IAT), and the Hooper questionnaire.
For the aerobic-oriented session, players reported greater distances during AEROBIC-SPEED periodization than SPEED-AEROBIC in 15-20 km/h (1273.53±328.51 m vs. 1174.84±210.33 m, P<0.05) and 20-25 km/h (658.92±264.41 m vs. 478.17±259.10 m, P<0.01). For the speed-oriented session, players reported greater distances during SPEED-AEROBIC than AEROBIC-SPEED periodization in 20-25 km/h (298.84±120.12 m vs. 223.24±114.86 m, P<0.05) and >25 km/h (110.74±34.65 m vs. 84.96±43.85 m, P<0.05). Tests revealed similar values for CONTROL and TEST between the two experimental weeks for CMJ, 20m, IAT and Hooper.
The physical qualities (both aerobic and speed), when periodized at the beginning of the week (on MD-4) rather than later (MD-2) showed higher external loads without changing the readiness level on MD. The results emphasize the need to periodize the training contents according to the aim of the cycle.
训练有素的学院足球运动员通常在训练周的第一次和第二次高强度训练课中，分别先进行有氧训练课，然后进行速度训练课。本研究旨在调查这些体能训练课的顺序是否会影响外部训练负荷以及比赛日的后续准备状态。
25名训练有素的学院足球运动员（12名U17和13名U19）参与了随机呈现的两个实验周。有氧-速度周期安排在MD-4进行有氧训练课，在MD-2进行速度训练课。速度-有氧周期安排则相反。在这两次训练课期间，运动员佩戴全球定位系统并对自觉用力程度（RPE）进行评分。运动员还在MD-4进行了基线值测试（对照）和比赛日测试（测试）。测试包括反向移动纵跳（CMJ）、20米短跑、伊利诺伊敏捷性测试（IAT）和胡珀问卷。
对于有氧训练课，在有氧-速度周期安排中，运动员在15-20公里/小时（1273.53±328.51米对1174.84±210.33米，P<0.05）和20-25公里/小时（658.92±264.41米对478.17±259.10米，P<0.01）速度下的跑动距离比速度-有氧周期安排时更长。对于速度训练课，在速度-有氧周期安排中，运动员在20-25公里/小时（298.84±120.12米对223.24±114.86米，P<0.05）和>25公里/小时（110.74±34.65米对84.96±43.85米，P<0.05）速度下的跑动距离比有氧-速度周期安排时更长。测试显示，在两个实验周之间，CMJ、20米、IAT和胡珀问卷的对照和测试值相似。
当在一周开始时（MD-4）而非之后（MD-2）进行体能素质（有氧和速度）的周期安排时，外部负荷更高，而不改变比赛日的准备状态。结果强调了根据周期目标对训练内容进行周期安排的必要性。
