1Department of Physical Training, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway; 2Department of Physical Training, Norwegian Olympic Sports Center, Oslo, Norway; and 3Department of Sports, University of Nordland, Bodø, Norway.
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Nov;27(11):2966-72. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828c2889.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of in-season combined resisted agility and repeated sprint training with strength training on soccer players' agility, linear single sprint speed, vertical jump, repeated sprint ability (RSA), and aerobic capacity. Twenty well-trained elite female soccer players of age ± SD 19.4 ± 4.4 years volunteered to participate in this study. The participants were randomly assigned to either the agility and repeated sprint training group or to the strength training group. All the participants were tested before and after a 10-week specific conditioning program. The pretest and posttest were conducted on 3 separate days with 1 day of low-intensity training in between. Test day 1 consisted of squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), and RSA. Test day 2 consisted of a 40-m maximal linear sprint and an agility test, whereas a Beep test was conducted on test day 3 to assess aerobic capacity. The agility and repeated sprint training implemented in this study did not have a significant effect on agility, although there was a tendency for moderate improvements from 8.23 ± 0.32 to 8.06 ± 0.21 seconds (d = 0.8). There was a significant (p < 0.01) and moderate-positive effect on Beep-test performance from level 9.6 ± 1.4 to level 10.8 ± 1.0, and only a trivial small effect on all other physical variables measured in this study. The strength training group had a positive, moderate, and significant (p < 0.01) effect on Beep-test performance from level 9.7 ± 1.3 to level 10.9 ± 1.2 (d = 1.0) and a significant (p < 0.05) but small effect (d = 0.5) on SJ performance (25.9 ± 2.7 to 27.5 ± 4.1 cm). Furthermore, the strength training implemented in this study had a trivial and negative effect on agility performance (d = -0.1). No between-group differences were observed. The outcome of this study indicates the importance of a well-planned program of conditioning that does not result in a decreased performance of the players, the great importance of strength and conditioning specialist in implementing the training program, and the importance of choosing the time of the year to implement such conditioning training programs. However, the fact that the present training program did not cause any decline in performance indicates that it is useful in maintaining the soccer players' physical performance during the competition period.
本研究旨在比较赛季中结合阻力灵敏性和重复冲刺训练与力量训练对足球运动员灵敏性、直线冲刺速度、垂直跳跃、重复冲刺能力(RSA)和有氧能力的影响。20 名训练有素的精英女性足球运动员,年龄为 ± SD 19.4 ± 4.4 岁,自愿参加这项研究。参与者被随机分配到灵敏性和重复冲刺训练组或力量训练组。所有参与者都在 10 周特定训练计划前后进行了测试。预测试和后测试在 3 个不同的日子进行,中间有 1 天进行低强度训练。测试日 1 包括深蹲跳(SJ)、反向跳(CMJ)和 RSA。测试日 2 包括 40 米最大直线冲刺和灵敏性测试,而在测试日 3 进行了 Beep 测试以评估有氧能力。本研究中实施的灵敏性和重复冲刺训练对灵敏性没有显著影响,尽管有适度改善的趋势,从 8.23 ± 0.32 秒提高到 8.06 ± 0.21 秒(d = 0.8)。对 Beep 测试成绩有显著(p < 0.01)和适度正影响,从水平 9.6 ± 1.4 提高到水平 10.8 ± 1.0,对本研究中测量的所有其他身体变量只有微小的小影响。力量训练组对 Beep 测试成绩有积极的、适度的和显著的(p < 0.01)影响,从水平 9.7 ± 1.3 提高到水平 10.9 ± 1.2(d = 1.0),对 SJ 成绩有显著(p < 0.05)但较小的影响(d = 0.5)(从 25.9 ± 2.7 提高到 27.5 ± 4.1 厘米)。此外,本研究中实施的力量训练对灵敏性表现有轻微的负面影响(d = -0.1)。没有观察到组间差异。这项研究的结果表明,进行计划周密的训练计划非常重要,这样可以保持球员的表现,力量和训练专家在实施训练计划中的重要性,以及选择实施这种训练计划的时间的重要性。然而,本训练计划并没有导致表现下降的事实表明,它在比赛期间保持足球运动员的身体表现是有用的。