Mlaver Eli, Atkins Elizabeth V, Medeiros Regina S, Sharma Jyotirmay, Solomon Gina, Galloway Luke, Todd Samual R, Dunne James R, Ashley Dennis W
From the Department of Surgery (E.M., L.G., J.S.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Georgia Trauma Commission (E.A., G.S.), Madison; Wellstar Medical College of Georgia, (R.M.) Medical College of Georgia Augusta University, Augusta; Grady Health System (S.T.), Atlanta; Memorial Health University Medical Center (J.D.), Savannah; Department of Surgery (D.A.), Atrium Health Navicent, Macon, Georgia.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025 Mar 1;98(3):410-417. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004505. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma center verification has demonstrated improved outcomes at individual centers, but its impact on statewide Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Collaboratives is unknown. A statewide TQIP Collaborative, founded in 2011, noted underperformance in six of eight patient cohorts identified in the TQIP Collaborative report. We hypothesized that requiring ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers would result in improved outcomes for the state collaborative.
The ACS verification requirement was tied to ongoing Trauma Commission funding. Trauma centers were required to apply for an ACS consultative visit by 2017 and were given until 2023 to achieve ACS verification. The effect of this intervention was measured in the number of centers achieving verification and in the performance of the TQIP Collaborative semiannual reports.
In 2015, only 1 of 15 (7%) trauma centers were ACS verified, and 4 had undergone consultative visits. By 2023, 11 of 12 (92%) trauma centers achieved ACS verification. Following this intervention, the observed-to-expected odds ratio for all-patient morbidity and mortality improved from 1.60 to 1.17, and variation among patient-specific cohorts narrowed from 0.97-1.82 to 0.96-1.48 (Figure 2). Performance in all six underperforming patient-specific cohorts improved over the study period.
ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers improves TQIP Collaborative performance. Statewide Collaboratives should consider ACS verification as a requirement for participation.
Economic and Value-Based Evaluations; Level III.
美国外科医师学会(ACS)创伤中心认证已证明可改善各中心的治疗效果,但其对全州创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)协作组织的影响尚不清楚。一个成立于2011年的全州TQIP协作组织注意到,在TQIP协作报告中确定的八个患者队列中的六个队列表现不佳。我们假设要求一级和二级创伤中心进行ACS认证将改善该州协作组织的治疗效果。
ACS认证要求与创伤委员会的持续资金挂钩。创伤中心必须在2017年前申请ACS咨询访问,并在2023年前获得ACS认证。通过获得认证的中心数量以及TQIP协作组织半年报的表现来衡量这一干预措施的效果。
2015年,15个创伤中心中只有1个(7%)获得了ACS认证,4个接受了咨询访问。到2023年,12个创伤中心中有11个(92%)获得了ACS认证。在这一干预措施实施后,所有患者发病和死亡的观察与预期比值比从1.60提高到1.17,特定患者队列之间的差异从0.97 - 1.82缩小到0.96 - 1.48(图2)。在研究期间,所有六个表现不佳的特定患者队列的表现都有所改善。
一级和二级创伤中心的ACS认证可改善TQIP协作组织的表现。全州协作组织应考虑将ACS认证作为参与的一项要求。
基于经济和价值的评估;三级。