Suppr超能文献

对慢性上肢运动功能障碍的中风幸存者同侧运动诱发电位分析的客观方法评估。

Evaluation of objective methods for analyzing ipsilateral motor evoked potentials in stroke survivors with chronic upper extremity motor impairment.

作者信息

Mohan Akhil, Li Xin, Zhang Bei, Knutson Jayme S, Widina Morgan, Wang Xiaofeng, Uchino Ken, Plow Ela B, Cunningham David A

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.

出版信息

J Neural Eng. 2025 Apr 22;22(2):026063. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ada827.

Abstract

Ipsilateral motor evoked potentials (iMEPs) are believed to represent cortically evoked excitability of uncrossed brainstem-mediated pathways. In the event of extensive injury to (crossed) corticospinal pathways, which can occur following a stroke, uncrossed ipsilateral pathways may serve as an alternate resource to support the recovery of the paretic limb. However, iMEPs, even in neurally intact people, can be small, infrequent, and noisy, so discerning them in stroke survivors is very challenging. This study aimed to investigate the inter-rater reliability of iMEP features (presence/absence, amplitude, area, onset, and offset) to evaluate the reliability of existing methods for objectively analyzing iMEPs in stroke survivors with chronic upper extremity (UE) motor impairment.Two investigators subjectively measured iMEP features from thirty-two stroke participants with chronic UE motor impairment. Six objective methods based on standard deviation (SD) and mean consecutive differences (MCD) were used to measure the iMEP features from the same 32 participants. IMEP analysis used both trial-by-trial (individual signal) and average-signal analysis approaches. Inter-rater reliability of iMEP features and agreement between the subjective and objective methods were analyzed (percent agreement-PA and intraclass correlation coefficient-ICC).Inter-rater reliability was excellent for iMEP detection (PA > 85%), amplitude, and area (ICC > 0.9). Of the six objective methods we tested, the 1SD method was most appropriate for identifying and analyzing iMEP amplitude and area (ICC > 0.9) in both trial-by-trial and average signal analysis approaches. None of the objective methods were reliable for analyzing iMEP onset and offset. Results also support using the average-signal analysis approach over the trial-by-trial analysis approach, as it offers excellent reliability for iMEP analysis in stroke survivors with chronic UE motor impairment.Findings from our study have relevance for understanding the role of ipsilateral pathways that typically survive unilateral severe white matter injury in people with stroke.

摘要

同侧运动诱发电位(iMEPs)被认为代表未交叉的脑干介导通路的皮质诱发兴奋性。在中风后可能发生的(交叉的)皮质脊髓通路广泛损伤的情况下,未交叉的同侧通路可能作为一种替代资源来支持瘫痪肢体的恢复。然而,即使在神经功能正常的人中,iMEPs也可能很小、出现频率低且有噪声,因此在中风幸存者中识别它们非常具有挑战性。本研究旨在调查iMEP特征(存在/不存在、幅度、面积、起始和偏移)的评分者间可靠性,以评估现有方法在客观分析慢性上肢(UE)运动障碍中风幸存者iMEPs方面的可靠性。两名研究人员主观测量了32名患有慢性UE运动障碍的中风参与者的iMEP特征。使用基于标准差(SD)和平均连续差异(MCD)的六种客观方法测量了同一32名参与者的iMEP特征。iMEP分析采用逐次试验(单个信号)和平均信号分析方法。分析了iMEP特征的评分者间可靠性以及主观和客观方法之间的一致性(一致性百分比-PA和组内相关系数-ICC)。iMEP检测(PA>85%)、幅度和面积的评分者间可靠性极佳(ICC>0.9)。在我们测试的六种客观方法中,1SD方法最适合在逐次试验和平均信号分析方法中识别和分析iMEP幅度和面积(ICC>0.9)。没有一种客观方法在分析iMEP起始和偏移方面是可靠的。结果还支持使用平均信号分析方法而非逐次试验分析方法,因为它在慢性UE运动障碍中风幸存者的iMEP分析中具有极佳的可靠性。我们研究的结果对于理解同侧通路在中风患者单侧严重白质损伤后通常仍能保留的作用具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b12c/12035742/96d95fe4327b/jneada827f1_hr.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验