Qiu Yue, Tai Yang, Li Ying, Wei Qu, Wu Hao, Li Kang
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, PR China; Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, PR China; Biofluid Lab, Sichuan University-Pittsburgh Institute, Sichuan University, PR China.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, PR China.
J Biomech. 2025 Feb;180:112498. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112498. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
Portal hypertension (PH) is the initial and main consequence of liver cirrhosis. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement has been widely used to estimate portal pressure gradient (PPG) and detect portal hypertension. However, some clinical studies have found poor correlation between HVPG and PPG, which may lead to the misdiagnosis of portal hypertension. In this study, we provided a method to evaluate patients' PPG based on clinically measured HVPG with computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Twenty-five patients who underwent HVPG measurement were recruit for analysis. Results show that HVPG significantly correlates with PPG (R = 0.7499, P < 0.0001), with an accuracy to distinguish clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) as high as 92 %. However, PH severity classification was underestimated for 36 % patients, especially for patients with hepatic venous collateral formation and presinusoidal portal vein occlusion. It is concluded that HVPG is a relatively reliable diagnostic method for PH when PPG cannot be directly measured. For patients who have clinical symptoms of PH but their HVPG are within a normal range, numerical evaluation of PPG with CFD is an excellent way for their diagnosis.
门静脉高压(PH)是肝硬化的首要和主要后果。肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)测量已被广泛用于估计门静脉压力梯度(PPG)并检测门静脉高压。然而,一些临床研究发现HVPG与PPG之间的相关性较差,这可能导致门静脉高压的误诊。在本研究中,我们提供了一种基于临床测量的HVPG并结合计算流体动力学(CFD)来评估患者PPG的方法。招募了25例接受HVPG测量的患者进行分析。结果显示,HVPG与PPG显著相关(R = 0.7499,P < 0.0001),区分临床显著性门静脉高压(CSPH)的准确率高达92%。然而,36%的患者门静脉高压严重程度分类被低估,尤其是肝静脉侧支形成和窦前门静脉阻塞的患者。得出结论,当无法直接测量PPG时,HVPG是诊断门静脉高压相对可靠的方法。对于有门静脉高压临床症状但其HVPG在正常范围内的患者,用CFD对PPG进行数值评估是诊断他们的一种很好的方法。