Smith Tracy T, Wahlquist Amy E, Wagener Theodore L, Cummings K Michael, Carpenter Matthew J
Medical University of South Carolina and Hollings Cancer Center, United States.
East Tennessee State University, Center for Rural Health Research, United States.
Addict Behav. 2025 Apr;163:108240. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108240. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
The impact of e-cigarette flavoring on e-cigarette uptake and switching to e-cigarettes among adults who smoke is critical to e-cigarette regulation in the United Sates. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to assess the impact of e-cigarette flavoring choice on e-cigarette uptake and changes in cigarette smoking in a large nationwide trial of e-cigarette provision in the United States.
A free four-week supply of e-cigarettes was provided with minimal instructions to use to adults who smoke (N = 427). Participants selected from five flavor options: tobacco, menthol, blue/blackberry (one flavor), apple melon, or iced fruit. Participants could choose up to two flavors for each of two, two-week provisions of e-cigarettes.
Participants who received an e-cigarette were 52 % female, 32 % non-white, and smoked an average (SD) of 14.8 (7.2) cigarettes per day at baseline. Only 5 % (n = 22) of participants chose to exclusively receive tobacco flavor. Compared to participants who exclusively received the tobacco flavor, participants who received any other flavor combination had greater e-cigarette uptake at the end of product provision (74 % vs. 55 %), were more likely to reduce cigarette smoking by at least 50 % at the end of product provision (34 % vs. 14 %) and at the final 6-month follow up (29 % vs. 5 %), and numerically, but not statistically, more likely to be abstinent from cigarettes at the end of product provision (11 % vs. 5 %) and the final 6-month follow-up (14 % vs. 5 %).
Results suggest that non-tobacco e-cigarette flavors may be more appealing than tobacco flavors, and better promote uptake of e-cigarettes and cigarette smoking reduction. Large-scale randomized trials in which participants are assigned to either tobacco or non-tobacco flavors are critical.
电子烟口味对成年吸烟者采用电子烟以及转而使用电子烟的影响,对于美国的电子烟监管至关重要。这项二次分析的目的是,在美国一项大规模全国性电子烟供应试验中,评估电子烟口味选择对电子烟采用情况以及吸烟变化的影响。
向成年吸烟者(N = 427)免费提供为期四周的电子烟,并给予最少的使用说明。参与者从五种口味选项中选择:烟草味、薄荷醇味、蓝莓/黑莓味(一种口味)、苹果瓜味或冰果味。在两次为期两周的电子烟供应中,参与者每次可为每种口味选择多达两种口味。
接受电子烟的参与者中,52%为女性,32%为非白人,基线时平均每天吸烟14.8支(标准差7.2支)。只有5%(n = 22)的参与者选择只接受烟草味。与只接受烟草味的参与者相比,接受任何其他口味组合的参与者在产品供应结束时采用电子烟的比例更高(74%对55%),在产品供应结束时(34%对14%)以及最终6个月随访时(29%对5%)更有可能将吸烟量减少至少50%,并且在数值上(但无统计学意义),在产品供应结束时(11%对5%)和最终6个月随访时(14%对5%)更有可能戒烟。
结果表明,非烟草味电子烟口味可能比烟草味更具吸引力,并且能更好地促进电子烟的采用和减少吸烟。将参与者随机分配到烟草味或非烟草味的大规模随机试验至关重要。