He Bi-Ming, Shi Zhen-Kai, Chen Rui, Wang Hai-Feng
Department of Urology, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
Department of Urology, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):e092489. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092489.
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard surgical treatment to lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO). Although it has been proven to have substantial efficacy in improving functional outcomes, it has shown a high incidence of complications, including transurethral resection syndrome, massive bleeding, urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) is a novel non-thermal ablation technique that delivers pulsed high-voltage but low-energy electric current to the cell membrane, thereby leading to cell death. H-FIRE has been reported to be tissue-selective, which leads to fewer side effects. However, no data are available on whether H-FIRE is non-inferior compared with TURP in treating patients with LUTS/BPO regarding safety and efficacy.
This trial is a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled, double-blinded and non-inferiority study in which all men with LUTS/BPO are included. This study aims to determine whether the HI-FIRE is non-inferior to TURP for achieving better functional outcomes as measured by the co-primary outcome of the change from baseline in maximal flow rate (Q) and the urinary symptoms by questionnaire of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) scoring at 3 months after surgical treatment. The main inclusion criteria are men with prostatic volume range 30 to 100 mL, Q<15 mL/s and IPSS>8. A sample size of 118 participants is required, accounting for a 20% loss. All participants will be randomly allocated at a ratio of 1:1 to the H-FIRE arm (n=59) and the TURP arm (n=59). The primary outcome is to assess the change from baseline in Q and IPSS scoring at 3 months after surgical treatment.
Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. The results of the study will be disseminated and published in international peer-reviewed journals.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05306145.
经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)是治疗下尿路症状和良性前列腺梗阻(LUTS/BPO)的金标准手术治疗方法。尽管已证明其在改善功能结局方面具有显著疗效,但它显示出较高的并发症发生率,包括经尿道切除综合征、大出血、尿失禁和性功能障碍。高频不可逆电穿孔(H-FIRE)是一种新型非热消融技术,它向细胞膜输送脉冲高压但低能量电流,从而导致细胞死亡。据报道,H-FIRE具有组织选择性,副作用较少。然而,关于在治疗LUTS/BPO患者时,H-FIRE在安全性和疗效方面是否不劣于TURP,尚无相关数据。
本试验是一项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照、双盲非劣效性研究,纳入所有患有LUTS/BPO的男性。本研究旨在确定通过手术治疗3个月后最大尿流率(Q)相对于基线的变化以及国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)问卷所评估的尿路症状这两个共同主要结局指标来衡量,H-FIRE在实现更好的功能结局方面是否不劣于TURP。主要纳入标准为前列腺体积在30至100 mL之间、Q<15 mL/s且IPSS>8的男性。需要118名参与者的样本量,考虑到20%的损耗率。所有参与者将以1:1的比例随机分配至H-FIRE组(n = 59)和TURP组(n = 59)。主要结局是评估手术治疗3个月后Q和IPSS评分相对于基线的变化。
已获得中国上海同济大学医学院附属东方医院伦理委员会的伦理批准。本研究结果将在国际同行评审期刊上发表和传播。
ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05306145