Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚职业治疗师对患有痴呆症和轻度认知障碍的老年人驾驶安全问题管理的看法。

Australian occupational therapists' perspectives about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment.

作者信息

Spargo Claire, Laver Kate, Adey-Wakeling Zoe, Berndt Angela, George Stacey

机构信息

Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

Rehabilitation Aged and Palliative Care, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Feb;72(1):e13008. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.13008.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Driving safety may be compromised in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Occupational therapists assess and screen for driving safety in older people with cognitive impairment. However, little is known about their perspectives relating to these assessments. Aims included to (1) obtain perspectives from driver-trained and non-driver-trained occupational therapists about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI; (2) understand factors influencing clinician's behaviour relating to driving assessment; and (3) gain perspectives regarding resources to support fitness-to-drive assessment.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with occupational therapists recruited from driving assessment services, hospitals, and community settings in Australia. Data were analysed inductively using content analysis, followed by a deductive approach with two authors mapping subcategories to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity and Motivation-Behaviour model.

CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

No consumers were involved in the design or study analysis.

FINDINGS

Participants (n = 17) reported inconsistencies in how the fitness-to-drive assessment is managed, with driving safety concerns often missed or avoided. Perceived barriers to fitness-to-drive assessment included: (i) clinician's capabilities: limited knowledge about fitness-to-drive assessment, and difficulties having complex discussions with patients with cognitive impairment; (ii) motivational factors: lack of confidence, fear of damaging therapeutic relationship with patients, and desire to maintain a sense of professional identity; and (iii) environmental factors: lack of processes to support health professionals with identifying cognitive concerns, lack of clarity of who takes responsibility for managing driving safety concerns, time constraints for completing in-office assessments and limited access to practical occupational therapy driving assessments. Participants expressed a desire for an evidence-based clinical pathway to improve the knowledge and communication skills of clinicians from non-driving specialist settings.

CONCLUSION

Findings identify the need for an evidence-based pathway to support health professionals in managing driving safety concerns for people with dementia and MCI.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are brain conditions involving difficulty with memory and thinking, with dementia diagnosed when the changes are more severe. These conditions are not a normal part of getting older, but they are much more common in older people. Research has found that some, but not all, people with dementia and MCI show unsafe driving behaviours. As people with dementia and MCI are often unaware that their driving is unsafe, health professionals, such as doctors and occupational therapists, should be involved in deciding if, or when, they should stop driving. In this study, occupational therapists were asked to provide their opinions about how driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and MCI are managed by health professionals. Occupational therapists reported that there is variation in how concerns are managed, with driving problems often getting missed or avoided. They reported that this can happen because health professionals may not feel confident in their decision-making abilities, or they may feel that discussing driving concerns will cause the person to get upset or angry with them. They also reported that health professionals may not always know that a person has dementia or MCI, and if they do know, it is not always clear which health professional should take on the responsibility of considering the person's driving safety. The occupational therapists wanted a resource to support health professionals in providing more consistent care for patients relating to driving safety.

摘要

引言

痴呆症或轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者的驾驶安全可能会受到影响。职业治疗师会对认知障碍老年人的驾驶安全进行评估和筛查。然而,对于他们在这些评估方面的观点却知之甚少。研究目的包括:(1)获取接受过驾驶培训和未接受过驾驶培训的职业治疗师对痴呆症和MCI老年人驾驶安全问题管理的观点;(2)了解影响临床医生驾驶评估行为的因素;(3)获取有关支持驾驶适宜性评估资源的观点。

方法

对从澳大利亚驾驶评估服务机构、医院和社区环境中招募的职业治疗师进行半结构式访谈。采用内容分析法对数据进行归纳分析,随后由两位作者采用演绎法将子类别映射到理论领域框架以及能力、机会和动机-行为模型的领域。

消费者和社区参与

设计或研究分析过程未涉及消费者。

研究结果

参与者(n = 17)报告称,在驾驶适宜性评估的管理方式上存在不一致之处,驾驶安全问题常常被忽视或回避。驾驶适宜性评估的感知障碍包括:(i)临床医生的能力:对驾驶适宜性评估的知识有限,且难以与认知障碍患者进行复杂的讨论;(ii)动机因素:缺乏信心,担心破坏与患者的治疗关系,以及希望保持职业认同感;(iii)环境因素:缺乏支持卫生专业人员识别认知问题的流程,负责管理驾驶安全问题的人员不明确,在办公室完成评估的时间限制,以及实际职业治疗驾驶评估的获取有限。参与者表示希望有一个基于证据的临床路径,以提高非驾驶专科环境中临床医生的知识和沟通技能。

结论

研究结果表明需要一个基于证据的路径,以支持卫生专业人员管理痴呆症和MCI患者的驾驶安全问题。

通俗易懂的总结

痴呆症和轻度认知障碍(MCI)是涉及记忆和思维困难的脑部疾病,当变化更严重时被诊断为痴呆症。这些情况并非衰老的正常部分,但在老年人中更为常见。研究发现,部分但并非所有痴呆症和MCI患者表现出不安全的驾驶行为。由于痴呆症和MCI患者往往未意识到自己驾驶不安全,医生和职业治疗师等卫生专业人员应参与决定他们是否或何时应停止驾驶。在本研究中,职业治疗师被要求就卫生专业人员如何管理痴呆症和MCI老年人的驾驶安全问题提供意见。职业治疗师报告称,在问题管理方式上存在差异,驾驶问题常常被遗漏或回避。他们报告说,这可能是因为卫生专业人员可能对自己的决策能力缺乏信心,或者他们可能觉得讨论驾驶问题会导致患者对他们感到不安或生气。他们还报告说,卫生专业人员可能并不总是知道某人患有痴呆症或MCI,而且即使他们知道,也不总是清楚应由哪位卫生专业人员负责考虑该人的驾驶安全。职业治疗师希望有一个资源来支持卫生专业人员为患者提供与驾驶安全相关的更一致的护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验