Ryan Greta, Watchorn Valerie, Evans Sherryn
School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2024 Dec;71(6):1028-1040. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12982. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
Autistic children commonly receive simultaneous services from various health-care and other professionals, including occupational therapy, throughout their journey of diagnosis and consequent therapeutic support. Current best practice guidelines for supporting autistic youth emphasise the importance of interprofessional collaboration. Despite this, collaboration among health-care professionals does not always occur, and little is understood about clinicians' experiences of collaborative care. The aim of this study was to explore Australian paediatric occupational therapists' experiences of interprofessional collaboration and their perception of factors influencing collaboration when supporting autistic children.
This study employed an exploratory qualitative descriptive design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 Australian paediatric occupational therapists involved in service provision to autistic children. Questions explored clinicians' experiences and perceptions of interprofessional collaboration. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to inductively analyse data.
This study was conceptualised and conducted by a team of researchers with a range of personal and professional experiences with the autistic community. The research design was strongly informed by the Autism CRC'S research guidelines.
Three themes were generated highlighting factors that influence collaboration between occupational therapists and other professionals. The first emphasised that 'clinicians' capacity to collaborate' at both organisational and individual levels was understood to be greatly influenced by funding structures. The second emphasised that 'relationships are key to collaboration' with these often established through shared workplaces or clients. The third, 'shared perceptions make collaboration easier' described how shared perceptions of collaboration, the occupational therapy role, and autism-related frames of reference were perceived to influence interprofessional collaboration.
Findings indicate that, while occupational therapists perceive interprofessional collaboration as valuable in the support of autistic children, there are barriers to effective collaboration, particularly in the context of a marketised service delivery model.
This study looked at how Australian occupational therapists work with other professionals to support autistic children. Even though it is recommended that professionals work together to support autistic children and their families, this does not always happen. In this study, researchers interviewed 13 occupational therapists and asked what it is like working with other professionals, what is helpful, and what makes working together difficult. From these interviews, it was found that many things affect how well occupational therapists can work with other health professionals and teachers to support autistic children. Factors like funding and workplace rules affect how professionals work together. Having someone take on the role of leader and having good relationships between professionals made it easier to work together. It was also helpful when occupational therapists and other professionals shared similar ideas on how to support autistic children. The study could be improved if it had gathered more information about the occupational therapists' education and what they have learnt about working with other professionals. Overall, the therapists in this study believed that working together to support autistic children and their families was important, but that there are many challenges to making this happen. More research on this topic would be helpful.
自闭症儿童在整个诊断及后续治疗支持过程中,通常会同时接受来自包括职业治疗师在内的各类医疗保健及其他专业人员的服务。当前支持自闭症青少年的最佳实践指南强调跨专业协作的重要性。尽管如此,医疗保健专业人员之间的协作并非总能实现,而且对于临床医生在协作护理方面的经历了解甚少。本研究的目的是探讨澳大利亚儿科职业治疗师在支持自闭症儿童时的跨专业协作经历以及他们对影响协作因素的看法。
本研究采用探索性定性描述设计。对13名参与为自闭症儿童提供服务的澳大利亚儿科职业治疗师进行了半结构化访谈。问题探讨了临床医生的跨专业协作经历和看法。采用反思性主题分析法对数据进行归纳分析。
本研究由一组在自闭症社区有一系列个人和专业经验的研究人员构思并开展。研究设计深受自闭症合作研究中心研究指南的影响。
产生了三个主题,突出了影响职业治疗师与其他专业人员之间协作的因素。第一个主题强调,组织和个人层面的“临床医生协作能力”被认为在很大程度上受资金结构的影响。第二个主题强调“关系是协作的关键”,这些关系通常通过共享工作场所或客户建立。第三个主题“共同认知使协作更容易”描述了对协作、职业治疗角色以及与自闭症相关的参照框架的共同认知如何被认为会影响跨专业协作。
研究结果表明,虽然职业治疗师认为跨专业协作在支持自闭症儿童方面很有价值,但有效协作存在障碍,特别是在市场化服务提供模式的背景下。
本研究考察了澳大利亚职业治疗师如何与其他专业人员合作以支持自闭症儿童。尽管建议专业人员共同努力支持自闭症儿童及其家庭,但实际情况并非总是如此。在本研究中,研究人员采访了13名职业治疗师,询问与其他专业人员合作的情况、有帮助的方面以及合作困难的原因。从这些访谈中发现,许多因素会影响职业治疗师与其他医疗专业人员和教师合作支持自闭症儿童的效果。资金和工作场所规定等因素会影响专业人员的合作方式。有人担任领导角色以及专业人员之间关系良好会使合作更容易。当职业治疗师和其他专业人员在如何支持自闭症儿童方面有相似想法时也会有帮助。如果能收集更多关于职业治疗师的教育背景以及他们在与其他专业人员合作方面所学知识的信息,本研究可能会得到改进。总体而言,本研究中的治疗师认为共同努力支持自闭症儿童及其家庭很重要,但实现这一点存在许多挑战。对此主题进行更多研究将有所帮助。